Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28650354›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2017

Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence Beyond Milan Criteria After Resection: Validation of a Clinical Risk Score in an International Cohort.

Jian Zheng, Joanne F Chou, Mithat Gönen, Neeta Vachharajani, William C Chapman, Maria B Majella Doyle, Simon Turcotte, Franck Vandenbroucke-Menu, Réal Lapointe, Stefan Buettner and 18 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meta-analysis of Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival Among Resected Patients with Spontaneous Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jian Zheng*Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY †Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY ‡Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO §Department of Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada ¶Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands ||Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore **Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center, Singapore, Singapore.
Joanne F Chou
Mithat Gönen
Neeta Vachharajani
William C Chapman
Maria B Majella Doyle
Simon Turcotte
Franck Vandenbroucke-Menu
Réal Lapointe
Stefan Buettner
Bas Groot Koerkamp
Jan N M Ijzermans
Chung Yip Chan
Brian K P Goh
Jin Yao Teo
Juinn Huar Kam
Prema R Jeyaraj
Peng Chung Cheow
Alexander Y F Chung
Pierce K H Chow
London L P J Ooi
Vinod P Balachandran
T Peter Kingham
Peter J Allen
Michael I D'Angelica
Ronald P DeMatteo
William R Jarnagin
Ser Yee Lee
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USErasmus MC · NLUniversité de Montréal · CAWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to validate a previously reported recurrence clinical risk score (CRS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Salvage transplantation after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resection is limited to patients who recur within Milan criteria (MC). Predicting recurrence patterns may guide treatment recommendations.

methodsAn international, multicenter cohort of R0 resected HCC patients were categorized by MC status at presentation. CRS was calculated by assigning 1 point each for initial disease beyond MC, multinodularity, and microvascular invasion. Recurrence incidences were estimated using competing risks methodology, and conditional recurrence probabilities were estimated using the Bayes theorem.

resultsFrom 1992 to 2015, 1023 patients were identified, of whom 613 (60%) recurred at a median follow-up of 50 months. CRS was well validated in that all 3 factors remained independent predictors of recurrence beyond MC (hazard ratio 1.5-2.1, all P < 0.001) and accurately stratified recurrence risk beyond MC, ranging from 19% (CRS 0) to 67% (CRS 3) at 5 years. Among patients with CRS 0, no other factors were significantly associated with recurrence beyond MC. The majority recurred within 2 years. After 2 years of recurrence-free survival, the cumulative risk of recurrence beyond MC within the next 5 years for all patients was 14%. This risk was 12% for patients with initial disease within MC and 17% for patients with initial disease beyond MC.

conclusionsCRS accurately predicted HCC recurrence beyond MC in this international validation. Although the risk of recurrence beyond MC decreased over time, it never reached zero.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalCarcinoma, HepatocellularHumansLiver NeoplasmsNeoplasm InvasivenessReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID28650354
PMCPMC8404085
OpenAlexW2712529358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.