Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28649582›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in psychology2017

Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up: Addressing the Needs of Infants and Toddlers Exposed to Inadequate or Problematic Caregiving.

Mary Dozier, Kristin Bernard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Cognitive Architecture of Infant Attachment.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Cognitive Functioning of Children in Out-of-Home Care.Journal of child & adolescent trauma · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mary DozierDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware.
Kristin BernardDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University.

Funding

Specialized services for high-risk birth parentsR01MH074374 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI DOZIER, MARY, TOTTENHAM, NIM · 2006 to 2023
$10.1M
SPECIALIZED MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR FOSTER INFANTSR01MH052135 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI DOZIER, MARY · 1996 to 2014
$6.7M
Early intervention for children adopted internationallyR01MH084135 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI DOZIER, MARY · 2009 to 2013
$3.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH052135NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074374NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parental sensitivity is key to the development of brain architecture, self-regulatory capabilities, and secure, organized attachments for infants and young children. For a variety of reasons, many parents struggle providing sensitive, responsive care. Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (ABC) is a 10-session home visiting program developed to enhance parental sensitivity. ABC has been shown effective in enhancing parental sensitivity, and enhancing children's attachment security and regulatory capabilities. A key feature of the intervention is providing parents practice and feedback in interacting sensitively with their children. Effectiveness in dissemination sites has been impressive, likely because treatment fidelity is defined well and monitored carefully.

Identifiers

PMID28649582
PMCPMC5477793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.