ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2017
Scholarly productivity and professional advancement of junior researchers receiving KL2, K23, or K08 awards at a large public research institution.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scholarly activity following National Institutes of Health Women's Reproductive Health Research K12 training-a cohort study.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Article
- Scholarly Productivity Evaluation of KL2 Scholars Using Bibliometrics and Federal Follow-on Funding: Cross-Institution Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Building an institutional K awardee program at UC Davis through utilization of CTSA resources.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Using publication data to evaluate a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) career development program: Early outcomes from KL2 scholars.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHow the productivity and careers of KL2 scholars compare with scholars receiving individual K-awards is unknown.
methodsThe productivity of KL2 scholars (n=21) at our institution was compared with that of K08 (n=34) and K23 (n=26) scholars.
resultsKL2 and K23 scholars had greater productivity than K08 scholars (
conclusionAt our institution, scholarly productivity and professional advancement did not differ by type of K-award.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.