Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28649454›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2017

Methods guiding stakeholder engagement in planning a pragmatic study on changing stroke systems of care.

Sabina B Gesell, Karen Potvin Klein, Jacqueline Halladay, Janet Prvu Bettger, Janet Freburger, Doyle M Cummings, Barbara J Lutz, Sylvia Coleman, Cheryl Bushnell, Wayne Rosamond and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02588664 (Early Supported Discharge for Improving Functional Outcomes After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02588664 nacompletednot on this map

Early Supported Discharge for Improving Functional Outcomes After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2016 to 2020Enrolled6,024ConditionsStroke, Transient Ischemic AttackArmsCOMPASS Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Challenges and Facilitators to Patient and Public Involvement In Stroke Research: Protocol for a Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sabina B GesellDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Karen Potvin KleinClinical and Translational Science Institute, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Jacqueline HalladayDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Janet Prvu BettgerSchool of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Janet FreburgerDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Doyle M CummingsDepartments of Family Medicine and Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Barbara J LutzSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA.
Sylvia ColemanDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Cheryl BushnellWake Forest Baptist Stroke Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Wayne RosamondDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Pamela W DuncanDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Funding

Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Comprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services (COMPASS) Study is one of the first large pragmatic randomized-controlled clinical trials using comparative effectiveness research methods, funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. In the COMPASS Study, we compare the effectiveness of a patient-centered, transitional care intervention versus usual care for stroke patients discharged home from acute care. Outcomes include stroke patient post-discharge functional status and caregiver strain 90 days after discharge, and hospital readmissions. A central tenet of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded research is stakeholder engagement throughout the research process. However, evidence on how to successfully implement a pragmatic trial that changes systems of care in combination with robust stakeholder engagement is limited. This combination is not without challenges.

methodsWe present our approach for broad-based stakeholder engagement in the context of a pragmatic trial with the participation of patients, caregivers, community stakeholders, including the North Carolina Stroke Care Collaborative hospital network, and policy makers. To maximize stakeholder engagement throughout the COMPASS Study, we employed a conceptual model with the following components: (1) Patient and Other Stakeholder Identification and Selection; (2) Patient and Other Stakeholder Involvement Across the Spectrum of Research Activities; (3) Dedicated Resources for Patient and Other Stakeholder Involvement; (4) Support for Patient and Other Stakeholder Engagement Through Organizational Processes; (5) Communication with Patients and Other Stakeholders; (6) Transparent Involvement Processes; (7) Tracking of Engagement; and (8) Evaluation of Engagement.

conclusionIn this paper, we describe how each component of the model is being implemented and how this approach addresses existing gaps in the literature on strategies for engaging stakeholders in meaningful and useful ways when conducting pragmatic trials.

Indexed as

community-based participatory researchcomparative effectiveness researchpatient engagementpragmatic clinical trialstroke

Identifiers

PMID28649454
PMCPMC5471818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.