ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2017
Methods guiding stakeholder engagement in planning a pragmatic study on changing stroke systems of care.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02588664 (Early Supported Discharge for Improving Functional Outcomes After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Early Supported Discharge for Improving Functional Outcomes After Stroke
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of interventions to support the transition home after acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC health services research · 2022Pooled it
- Implementation of a Transitional Care Model for Stroke: Perspectives From Frontline Clinicians, Administrators, and COMPASS-TC Implementation Staff.The Gerontologist · 2020Trial
- Implementation of a billable transitional care model for stroke patients: the COMPASS study.BMC health services research · 2019Trial
- Ensuring respect for persons in COMPASS: a cluster randomised pragmatic clinical trial.Journal of medical ethics · 2018Trial
- Hospital recruitment for a pragmatic cluster-randomized clinical trial: Lessons learned from the COMPASS study.Trials · 2018Trial
- The Comprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services (COMPASS) study: design and methods for a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial.BMC neurology · 2017Trial
- Lessons Learned From the Implementation of a Pragmatic Trial Evaluating Non-Pharmacological Approaches to Dementia Care in US Nursing Homes.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Challenges and Facilitators to Patient and Public Involvement In Stroke Research: Protocol for a Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Using Stakeholder Engagement to Build Cancer Survivorship Care Coordination Capacity Between Primary and Oncology Care.Health equity · 2025Article
- Establishing patient partners' roles on research teams: a scoping review.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Stroke patient and stakeholder engagement (SPSE): concepts, definitions, models, implementation strategies, indicators, and frameworks-a systematic scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Systematic overviews of partnership principles and strategies identified from health research about spinal cord injury and related health conditions: A scoping review.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Stakeholder engagement infrastructure to support multicenter research networks: Advances from the clinical research networks participating in PCORnet.Learning health systems · 2023Article
- Scoping review of models and frameworks of patient engagement in health services research.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Article
- Implementation of Complex Interventions: Lessons Learned From the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Transitional Care Portfolio.Medical care · 2021Article
- Stakeholder Engagement in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Emphasizing Relationships to Improve Pain Management Delivery and Outcomes.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2020Article
- How engagement of a diverse set of stakeholders shaped the design, implementation, and dissemination of a multicenter pragmatic trial of stroke transitional care: The COMPASS study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Using REDCap to track stakeholder engagement: A time-saving tool for PCORI-funded studies.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Comprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services (COMPASS) Study is one of the first large pragmatic randomized-controlled clinical trials using comparative effectiveness research methods, funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. In the COMPASS Study, we compare the effectiveness of a patient-centered, transitional care intervention versus usual care for stroke patients discharged home from acute care. Outcomes include stroke patient post-discharge functional status and caregiver strain 90 days after discharge, and hospital readmissions. A central tenet of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded research is stakeholder engagement throughout the research process. However, evidence on how to successfully implement a pragmatic trial that changes systems of care in combination with robust stakeholder engagement is limited. This combination is not without challenges.
methodsWe present our approach for broad-based stakeholder engagement in the context of a pragmatic trial with the participation of patients, caregivers, community stakeholders, including the North Carolina Stroke Care Collaborative hospital network, and policy makers. To maximize stakeholder engagement throughout the COMPASS Study, we employed a conceptual model with the following components: (1) Patient and Other Stakeholder Identification and Selection; (2) Patient and Other Stakeholder Involvement Across the Spectrum of Research Activities; (3) Dedicated Resources for Patient and Other Stakeholder Involvement; (4) Support for Patient and Other Stakeholder Engagement Through Organizational Processes; (5) Communication with Patients and Other Stakeholders; (6) Transparent Involvement Processes; (7) Tracking of Engagement; and (8) Evaluation of Engagement.
conclusionIn this paper, we describe how each component of the model is being implemented and how this approach addresses existing gaps in the literature on strategies for engaging stakeholders in meaningful and useful ways when conducting pragmatic trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.