Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28649432›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2017

An individual-based model for collective cancer cell migration explains speed dynamics and phenotype variability in response to growth factors.

Damian Stichel, Alistair M Middleton, Benedikt F Müller, Sofia Depner, Ursula Klingmüller, Kai Breuhahn, Franziska Matthäus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Aquaporin 5 expression regulates MDA-MB-231 spheroid multicellular invasion.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Modelling collective cell motion: are on- and off-lattice models equivalent?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Computational models of melanoma.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Damian Stichel *BIOMS/IWR, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany.
Alistair M Middleton *BIOMS/IWR, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany.
Benedikt F MüllerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 221, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sofia DepnerDKFZ Heidelberg, KKE Neuropathologie, Im Neuenheimer Feld 221, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany.
Ursula KlingmüllerDKFZ Heidelberg, KKE Neuropathologie, Im Neuenheimer Feld 221, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany.
Kai Breuhahn *Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 221, Heidelberg, Germany.
Franziska Matthäus *BIOMS/IWR, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEDKFZ-ZMBH Alliance · DEGerman Center for Lung Research · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collective cell migration is a common phenotype in epithelial cancers, which is associated with tumor cell metastasis and poor patient survival. However, the interplay between physiologically relevant pro-migratory stimuli and the underlying mechanical cell-cell interactions are poorly understood. We investigated the migratory behavior of different collectively migrating non-small cell lung cancer cell lines in response to motogenic growth factors (e.g. epidermal growth factor) or clinically relevant small compound inhibitors. Depending on the treatment, we observed distinct behaviors in a classical lateral migration assay involving traveling fronts, finger-shapes or the development of cellular bridges. Particle image velocimetry analysis revealed characteristic speed dynamics (evolution of the average speed of all cells in a frame) in all experiments exhibiting initial acceleration and subsequent deceleration of the cell populations. To better understand the mechanical properties of individual cells leading to the observed speed dynamics and the phenotypic differences we developed a mathematical model based on a Langevin approach. This model describes intercellular forces, random motility, and stimulation of active migration by mechanical interaction between cells. Simulations show that the model is able to reproduce the characteristic spatio-temporal speed distributions as well as most migratory phenotypes of the studied cell lines. A specific strength of the proposed model is that it identifies a small set of mechanical features necessary to explain all phenotypic and dynamical features of the migratory response of non-small cell lung cancer cells to chemical stimulation/inhibition. Furthermore, all processes included in the model can be associated with potential molecular components, and are therefore amenable to experimental validation. Thus, the presented mathematical model may help to predict which mechanical aspects involved in non-small cell lung cancer cell migration are affected by the respective therapeutic treatment.

Identifiers

PMID28649432
PMCPMC5460121
OpenAlexW2590255101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.