ArticleF1000Research2017
The impact factor of an open access journal does not contribute to an article's citations.
Article in F1000Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Ophthalmology journal article processing charges for publications in a post-COVID world.Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO · 2026Article
- The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
- Bibliometric insights into drug resistance in bladder cancer: Two decades of progress (1999-2022).Heliyon · 2024Article
- The Effect of Open Access on Scholarly and Societal Metrics of Impact in the ASHA Journals.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Open reproducible scientometric research with Alexandria3k.PloS one · 2023Article
- A comparison of scientometric data and publication policies of ophthalmology journals.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Assessing Open Science practices in physical activity behaviour change intervention evaluations.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2022Article
- An analysis of scientometric data and publication policies of rheumatology journals.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Article
- Comments on "Barriers to Impact Factor Growth in Two Major Psychiatry Journals in India".Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2021Article
- Scientometric Data and Open Access Publication Policies of Clinical Allergy and Immunology Journals.Cureus · 2021Article
- Evaluation of articles in metabolism research on the basis of their citations.Biochemia medica · 2021Article
- Article
- Publication patterns inRestorative dentistry & endodontics · 2019Article
- A literature analysis on anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy (anti-VEGF) using a bibliometric approach.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2019Review
- The democratization of scientific publishing.BMC medicine · 2019Review
- The impact of the open-access status on journal indices: a review of medical journals.F1000Research · 2019Review
- Exploring PubMed as a reliable resource for scholarly communications services.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2019Article
- 2018 CUA Abstracts.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2018Article
- Temporal Trends (1999-2015) in the Impact Factor of Biomedical Journals Published by US and EU Scientific Societies.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Citations of papers are positively influenced by the journal's impact factor (IF). For non-open access (non-OA) journals, this influence may be due to the fact that high-IF journals are more often purchased by libraries, and are therefore more often available to researchers, than low-IF journals. This positive influence has not, however, been shown specifically for papers published in open access (OA) journals, which are universally accessible, and do not need library purchase. It is therefore important to ascertain if the IF influences citations in OA journals too. Methods 203 randomized controlled trials (102 OA and 101 non-OA) published in January 2011 were included in the study. Five-year citations for papers published in OA journals were compared to those for non-OA journals. Source papers were derived from PubMed. Citations were retrieved from Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. The Thompson-Reuter's IF was used. Results OA journals were found to have significantly more citations overall compared to non-OA journals (median 15.5 vs 12, p=0.039). The IF did not correlate with citations for OA journals (Spearman's rho =0.187, p=0.60). The increase in the citations with increasing IF was minimal for OA journals (beta coefficient = 3.346, 95% CI -0.464, 7.156, p=0.084). In contrast, the IF did show moderate correlation with citations for articles published in non-OA journals (Spearman's rho=0.514, p<0.001). The increase in the number of citations was also significant (beta coefficient = 4.347, 95% CI 2.42, 6.274, p<0.001). Conclusion It is better to publish in an OA journal for more citations. It may not be worth paying high publishing fees for higher IF journals, because there is minimal gain in terms of increased number of citations. On the other hand, if one wishes to publish in a non-OA journal, it is better to choose one with a high IF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.