Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28649334›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2017

Population structure in chicory (

Tomáš Závada, Rondy J Malik, Rick V Kesseli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome-Wide Datasets of Chicories (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Characterization of SomePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Population structure in chicory (Ecology and evolution · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomáš ZávadaBiology Department University of Massachusetts Boston Boston MA USA.
Rondy J MalikBiology Department University of Massachusetts Boston Boston MA USA.
Rick V KesseliBiology Department University of Massachusetts Boston Boston MA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3975-5294
Boston University · US

Funding

Initiative for Maximizing Student Diversity at UMass BostonR25GM076321 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON · PI COLON-CARMONA, ADAN, SKVIRSKY, RACHEL · 2008 to 2022
$4.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM076321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant invasions are recognized as major drivers of ecosystem change, yet the precise cause of these invasions remains unknown for many species. Frequency and modes of introductions during the first, transport and colonization, stages of the invasion process as well as phenotypic changes due to plasticity or changing genetic diversity and adaptation during later establishment and expansion stages can all influence the "success" of invasion. Here, we examine some of these factors in, and the origin of, a very successful weed,

Indexed as

AsteraceaechicoryCichorium intybusgenetic diversitypopulation geneticsweed

Identifiers

PMID28649334
PMCPMC5478081
OpenAlexW2610825710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.