Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28648914›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2018

Psychometrics of social cognitive measures for psychosis treatment research.

Charlie A Davidson, Rebecca Lesser, Lori T Parente, Joanna M Fiszdon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Measuring mentalizing: A comparison of scoring methods for the hinting task.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charlie A DavidsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George St., Suite 901, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. Electronic address: charles.davidson@yale.edu.
Rebecca LesserDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George St., Suite 901, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. Electronic address: rebecca.lesser@yale.edu.
Lori T ParenteVA Connecticut Healthcare System, Psychology Service 116B, 950 Campbell Ave., West Haven, CT 06516, USA. Electronic address: lori.parente@va.gov.
Joanna M FiszdonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George St., Suite 901, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Psychology Service 116B, 950 Campbell Ave., West Haven, CT 06516, USA. Electronic address: joanna.fiszdon@yale.edu.

Funding

Research Training in Functional Disability InterventionsT32MH062994 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BELL, MORRIS D. · 2002 to 2017
$3.0M
Social Cognitive Training for Psychosis: Phase I Treatment DevelopmentR34MH090109 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FISZDON, JOANNA M. · 2011 to 2013
$516k
RR&D Senior Research Career Scientist AwardIK6RX002458 · VA · VA CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI MORRIS D. BELL · 2017 to 2026
–
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH090109NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH062994RRD VA IK6 RX002458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social cognition represents an important treatment target, closely linked to everyday social function. While a number of social cognitive interventions have recently been developed, measures used to evaluate these treatments are only beginning to receive psychometric scrutiny. Study goals were to replicate recently-published psychometrics for several social cognitive measures, and to provide information for additional social cognitive measures not included in recent reports. Forty-eight outpatients with psychotic-spectrum disorders completed measures of emotion perception, theory of mind, and attributional bias on two occasions, one month apart. Measures were tested for distributional characteristics, test-retest reliability, utility as a repeated measure, and relationship to symptoms and functioning. For a subgroup of participants, information about sensitivity to social cognitive treatment was also available. We replicated aspects of prior work, including largely favorable psychometric characteristics for the Bell-Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task, and promising but weaker characteristics for The Awareness of Social Inferences Test subscales and Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task. The Hinting Task had adequate test-retest statistics but a more pronounced ceiling effect. Ambiguous Intentions and Hostility Questionnaire data showed evidence of validity but were limited by inconsistency over time. Our results strongly support the Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases Scale for future evaluation as a social cognitive treatment outcome measure. Its scores were adequately distributed, consistent over time, related to symptoms and functioning, and sensitive to treatment effects. Other relatively novel assessments of attributional bias and theory of mind showed some promise, although more work is needed.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAdultCognition DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsPsychotic DisordersTime FactorsPsychometricsReliabilitySchizophreniaSocial cognitionValidity

Identifiers

PMID28648914
PMCPMC5741542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.