Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28648823›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017

The Evolution of Venom by Co-option of Single-Copy Genes.

Ellen O Martinson, Mrinalini, Yogeshwar D Kelkar, Ching-Ho Chang, John H Werren

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The genomic origins and evolutionary path to a key innovation in the world's most venomous snakes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. AnvRV virus in the parasitoid waspMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Toxins · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome of venomous caterpillarProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Duplication of a conserved mitochondrial enzyme gene arms parasitoid wasps with venom cytotoxicity and oogenesis regulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ellen O MartinsonBiology Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
MrinaliniBiology Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA. Electronic address: dbsmrin@nus.edu.sg.
Yogeshwar D KelkarBiology Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Ching-Ho ChangBiology Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
John H WerrenBiology Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA. Electronic address: jack.werren@rochester.edu.
University of Rochester · US

Funding

Exploring the Venom Repertoire of ParasitoidsR01GM098667 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WERREN, JOHN HAYNES · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classic model for the evolution of novel gene function is through gene duplication followed by evolution of a new function by one of the copies (neofunctionalization) [1, 2]. However, other modes have also been found, such as novel genes arising from non-coding DNA, chimeric fusions, and lateral gene transfers from other organisms [3-7]. Here we use the rapid turnover of venom genes in parasitoid wasps to study how new gene functions evolve. In contrast to the classic gene duplication model, we find that a common mode of acquisition of new venom genes in parasitoid wasps is co-option of single-copy genes from non-venom progenitors. Transcriptome and proteome sequencing reveal that recruitment and loss of venom genes occur primarily by rapid cis-regulatory expression evolution in the venom gland. Loss of venom genes is primarily due to downregulation of expression in the gland rather than gene death through coding sequence degradation. While the majority of venom genes have specialized expression in the venom gland, recent losses of venom function occur primarily among genes that show broader expression in development, suggesting that they can more readily switch functional roles. We propose that co-option of single-copy genes may be a common but relatively understudied mechanism of evolution for new gene functions, particularly under conditions of rapid evolutionary change.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene ExpressionAnimalsInsect ProteinsProteomeRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalTranscriptomeWaspsWasp VenomsInsect ProteinsProteomeWasp Venomscis-regulationevolutionneofunctionalizationnoveltyparasitoidproteometranscriptomevenomwasp

Identifiers

PMID28648823
PMCPMC5719492
OpenAlexW2719967308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.