Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28648726›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2017

Taking the measure of MicroED.

Jose A Rodriguez, David S Eisenberg, Tamir Gonen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Fast event-based electron counting for small-molecule structure determination by MicroED.Acta crystallographica. Section C, Structural chemistry · 2025
    Article
  4. 3D Nanocrystallography and the Imperfect Molecular Lattice.Annual review of physical chemistry · 2024
    Review
  5. Forty years in cryoEM of membrane proteins.Microscopy (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Ab Initio Determination of Peptide Structures by MicroED.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Data-driven challenges and opportunities in crystallography.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. MicroED structures of HIV-1 Gag CTD-SP1 reveal binding interactions with the maturation inhibitor bevirimat.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Where is crystallography going?Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jose A RodriguezDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA-DOE Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: jrodriguez@mbi.ucla.edu.
David S EisenbergDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Tamir GonenJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA; Departments of Biological Chemistry and Physiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA. Electronic address: tgonen@ucla.edu.

Funding

Structural Biology of Amyloid DiseaseR01AG029430 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI EISENBERG, DAVID · 2007 to 2016
$3.9M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIA NIH HHS R01 AG029430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now possible to routinely determine atomic resolution structures by electron cryo-microscopy (cryoEM), facilitated in part by the method known as micro electron-diffraction (MicroED). Since its initial demonstration in 2013, MicroED has helped determine a variety of protein structures ranging in molecular weight from a few hundred Daltons to several hundred thousand Daltons. Some of these structures were novel while others were previously known. The resolutions of structures obtained thus far by MicroED range from 3.2Å to 1.0Å, with most better than 2.5Å. Crystals of various sizes and shapes, with different space group symmetries, and with a range of solvent content have all been studied by MicroED. The wide range of crystals explored to date presents the community with a landscape of opportunity for structure determination from nano crystals. Here we summarize the lessons we have learned during the first few years of MicroED, and from our attempts at the first ab initio structure determined by the method. We re-evaluate theoretical considerations in choosing the appropriate crystals for MicroED and for extracting the most meaning out of measured data. With more laboratories worldwide adopting the technique, we speculate what the first decade might hold for MicroED.

Indexed as

AmyloidCryoelectron MicroscopyHumansProtein ConformationQuantum TheoryAmyloid

Identifiers

PMID28648726
PMCPMC5683914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.