ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2017
Stability metrics for optic radiation tractography: Towards damage prediction after resective surgery.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subject-Specific Automatic Reconstruction of White Matter Tracts.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- An atlas of white matter anatomy, its variability, and reproducibility based on constrained spherical deconvolution of diffusion MRI.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Fully automated delineation of the optic radiation for surgical planning using clinically feasible sequences.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Fourier Transform on the Homogeneous Space of 3D Positions and Orientations for Exact Solutions to Linear PDEs.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Topological principles and developmental algorithms might refine diffusion tractography.Brain structure & function · 2019Review
- Meyer's loop tractography for image-guided surgery depends on imaging protocol and hardware.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn accurate delineation of the optic radiation (OR) using diffusion MR tractography may reduce the risk of a visual field deficit after temporal lobe resection. However, tractography is prone to generate spurious streamlines, which deviate strongly from neighboring streamlines and hinder a reliable distance measurement between the temporal pole and the Meyer's loop (ML-TP distance). NEW
methodStability metrics are introduced for the automated removal of spurious streamlines near the Meyer's loop. Firstly, fiber-to-bundle coherence (FBC) measures can identify spurious streamlines by estimating their alignment with the surrounding streamline bundle. Secondly, robust threshold selection removes spurious streamlines while preventing an underestimation of the extent of the Meyer's loop. Standardized parameter selection is realized through test-retest evaluation of the variability in ML-TP distance.
resultsThe variability in ML-TP distance after parameter selection was below 2mm for each of the healthy volunteers studied (N=8). The importance of the stability metrics is illustrated for epilepsy surgery candidates (N=3) for whom the damage to the Meyer's loop was evaluated by comparing the pre- and post-operative OR reconstruction. The difference between predicted and observed damage is in the order of a few millimeters, which is the error in measured ML-TP distance. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): The stability metrics are a novel method for the robust estimate of the ML-TP distance.
conclusionsThe stability metrics are a promising tool for clinical trial studies, in which the damage to the OR can be related to the visual field deficit that may occur after epilepsy surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.