Cesarean in the second stage: a possible risk factor for subsequent spontaneous preterm birth.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Prediction of preterm birth using 3D volume cesarean scar morphology in pregnant women with previous advanced labor cesarean delivery.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
   Observational
2. Full-dilatation cesarean section and risk of cesarean scar diverticulum: a multi-institutional cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026
   Article
3. Late gestation MRI to assess maternal pelvimetry, fetal biometry and placental oxygenation: a retrospective pilot study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025
   Article
4. Escalating caesarean deliveries and the impact on subsequent preterm birth.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
   Review
5. Three-Dimensional Volume Ultrasound Assessment of Cesarean Scar Niche and Cervix in Pregnant Women: A Reproducibility Study.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025
   Article
6. Preterm Cesarean Delivery and Safety of Subsequent Delivery: Risk of Uterine Rupture and Other Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes-Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
   Article
7. Evaluating pregnancy outcomes in women with uterine fibroids treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound: insights from a single-institution study.Reproductive health · 2024
   Article
8. Neurodevelopment of Children Born with Forceps Delivery-A Single Tertiary Clinic Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
   Article
9. Cesarean section at full dilatation in the first birth is not associated with an increased risk of subsequent miscarriage: A historical cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024
   Article
10. Management of impacted fetal head at cesarean delivery.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024
    Review
11. Cesarean Uterine Lacerations and Prematurity in the Following Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Follow-Up Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
12. Risk of Preterm Birth among Secundiparas with a Previous Cesarean due to a Failed Vacuum Delivery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
13. Reproducibility of assessment of full-dilatation Cesarean section scar in women undergoing second-trimester screening for preterm birth.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2022
    Article
14. Late-stage Cesarean section causes recurrent early preterm birth: how to tackle this problem?Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2019
    Article
15. The pathophysiology of human premature cervical remodeling resulting in spontaneous preterm birth: Where are we now?Seminars in perinatology · 2017
    Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor and the risk of subsequent premature birth.2017

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as