Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28648575›Full record

Observational studyGastrointestinal endoscopy2018

Inadequate Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores predict the risk of missed neoplasia on the next colonoscopy.

Matthew A Kluge, J Lucas Williams, Connie K Wu, Brian C Jacobson, Paul C Schroy, David A Lieberman, Audrey H Calderwood

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04482452 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Percentage Visualized Mucosa as a Marker for the Quality of Colonoscopy

TypeobservationalSponsorInsel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRan2020 to 2022Enrolled500ConditionsColonoscopyArmsColonoscopy
NCT05465889 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Sulfate Solution and 3-liter Polyethylene Glycol on Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChanghai HospitalRan2019 to 2020Enrolled348ConditionsBowel Preparation for ColonoscopyArmsOral sulfate solution (OSS), Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte
NCT07605897 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Single-Center, Randomized, Prospective, Single-Blinded Study to Assess the Safety, Quality, and Tolerance of a Bowel Preparation Using a Food Kit With Laxatives in a United States Veteran Population

TypeinterventionalSponsorJoseph SpataroRan2022 to 2025Enrolled57ConditionsBowel Preparation, Efficacy, Tolerability, Safety, Colon Cancer Screening, Bowel Preparation for ColonoscopyArmsUse of a standardized meal content (food-kit) the day prior to colonoscopy, Polyethylene glycol 3350 - electrolyte solution (GoLYTELY)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Quality indicators for colonoscopy.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Colorectal cancer: local results and significance in Hungary.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew A KlugeDepartment of Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Lucas WilliamsThe Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Connie K WuBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brian C JacobsonSection of Gastroenterology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Paul C SchroySection of Gastroenterology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David A LiebermanDivision of Gastroenterology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Audrey H CalderwoodSection of Gastroenterology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Boston University · USBoston Medical Center · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USHealth Outcomes Solutions (United States) · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

National Endoscopic Database of the Clinical Outcomes Research InitiativeU01DK057132 · NIDDK · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LIEBERMAN, DAVID A · 1999 to 2014
$12.7M
CORI: Consortium Expansion and Database EnhancementR33DK061778 · NIDDK · OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LIEBERMAN, DAVID A · 2002 to 2004
$1.4M
A Novel Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Scale: Education, Validation, and UtilityK08DK090150 · NIDDK · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI CALDERWOOD, AUDREY HONG · 2011 to 2015
$711k
Colonoscopy in Rural Oregon Practice (CROP)R21CA131626 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LIEBERMAN, DAVID A · 2008 to 2009
$381k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA131626NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK090150NIDDK NIH HHS R33 DK061778NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK057132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe risks of missed findings after inadequate bowel preparation are not fully characterized in a diverse cohort. We aimed to evaluate the likelihood of missed polyps after an inadequate preparation as assessed by using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).

methodsIn this observational study of prospectively collected data within a large, national, endoscopic consortium, we identified patients aged 50 to 75 years who underwent average-risk screening colonoscopy (C1) followed by a second colonoscopy for any indication within 3 years (C2). We determined the polyp detection rates (PDRs) and advanced PDRs during C2 stratified by C1 BBPS scores.

resultsAmong segment pairs without polyps at C1 (N = 601), those with inadequate C1 BBPS segment scores had a higher PDR at C2 (10%) compared with those with adequate bowel preparation at C1 (5%; P = .04). Among segment pairs with polyps at C1 (N = 154), segments with inadequate bowel preparation scores at C1 had higher advanced PDRs at C2 (20%) compared with those with adequate bowel preparation scores at C1 (4%; P = .03). In multivariable analysis, the presence of advanced polyps at C1 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.5; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 1.1-10.8) but not inadequate BBPS scores at C1 (adjusted OR 1.8; 95% CI, 0.6-5.1) was associated with a significantly increased risk of advanced polyps at C2.

conclusionsInadequate BBPS segment scores generally are associated with higher rates of polyps and advanced polyps at subsequent colonoscopy within a short timeframe. The presence of advanced polyps as well as inadequate BBPS segment scores can inform the risk of missed polyps and help triage which patients warrant a timely repeat colonoscopy.

Indexed as

AgedCatharticsColonColonic PolypsColonoscopyDiagnostic ErrorsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRiskUnited StatesCathartics

Identifiers

PMID28648575
PMCPMC5742069
OpenAlexW2654136388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.