Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28647891›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2017

Is it reasonable to use a lower DOACs dose in some patients with VTE? Yes.

Davide Imberti, Daniela Mastroiacovo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Davide ImbertiInternal Medicine Department, Piacenza Hospital, Haemostasis and Thrombosis Center, Piacenza, Italy.
Daniela MastroiacovoAngiology Unit, SS Filippo and Nicola Hospital, Avezzano, AQ, Italy. daniela.mastroiacovo@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Hokusai-VTE trial, 733 patients were treated with the reduced dose edoxaban regimen, which maintained efficacy and safety compared with the 60 mg dose, and was safer than warfarin. The prophylactic doses of apixaban and rivaroxaban reduced the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the extended treatment trials. Dabigatran 110 mg was approved by the European Medicine Agency for VTE treatment. Further data from registries and real-world studies will help to clarify whether patients, with other specific characteristics, can benefit from the reduced dose of direct oral anticoagulants.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsDabigatranEvidence-Based MedicineHumansPyrazolesPyridinesPyridonesRivaroxabanThiazolesVenous ThromboembolismWarfarinAnticoagulantsapixabanDabigatranedoxabanPyrazolesPyridinesPyridonesRivaroxabanThiazolesWarfarinDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs)Lower doseVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.