ArticlePlant cell reports2017
Genetic dissection of adventitious shoot regeneration in roses by employing genome-wide association studies.
Article in Plant cell reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- A chromosome 2 locus controls transient Agrobacterium-mediated GFP expression in rose petals.Plant cell reports · 2026Article
- Engineering resilient roses: molecular insights into biotic and abiotic stress adaptation.Horticulture research · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Soybean Regeneration-Related Traits and Functional Exploration of Candidate Genes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Overcoming Recalcitrance: A Review of Regeneration Methods and Challenges in Roses.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Superior In Vitro Responses of a Native Rose Genotype to Driver Kuniyuki Walnut (DKW) Medium in a Comparative Study Using Natural and Synthetic Plant Growth Regulators.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Unraveling the genetic basis of Rhizobium rhizogenes-mediated transformation and hairy root formation in rose using a genome-wide association study.Plant cell reports · 2024Article
- Genome-wide association study (GWAS) analyses of early anatomical changes in rose adventitious root formation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the Trihelix transcription factor family in potato (PeerJ · 2024Article
- GWAS of adventitious root formation in roses identifies a putative phosphoinositide phosphatase (SAC9) for marker-assisted selection.PloS one · 2023Article
- Morphological studies of rose prickles provide new insights.Horticulture research · 2021Article
- Detection of Reproducible Major Effect QTL for Petal Traits in Garden Roses.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Recent Large-Scale Genotyping and Phenotyping of Plant Genetic Resources of Vegetatively Propagated Crops.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The genetic framework of shoot regeneration in Arabidopsis comprises master regulators and conditional fine-tuning factors.Communications biology · 2020Article
- Natural Variation in Plant Pluripotency and Regeneration.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- In the name of the rose: a roadmap for rose research in the genome era.Horticulture research · 2019Article
- A high-quality genome sequence of Rosa chinensis to elucidate ornamental traits.Nature plants · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
key messageWe analysed the capacity to regenerate adventitious shoots in 96 rose genotypes and found 88 SNP markers associated with QTLs, some of which are derived from candidate genes for shoot regeneration. In an association panel of 96 rose genotypes previously analysed for petal colour, we conducted a genome-wide association study on the capacity of leaf petioles for direct shoot regeneration. Shoot regeneration rate and shoot ratio (number of shoots/total number of explants) were used as phenotypic descriptors for regeneration capacity. Two independent experiments were carried out with six replicates of ten explants each. We found significant variation between the genotypes ranging from 0.88 to 88.33% for the regeneration rate and from 0.008 to 1.2 for the shoot ratio, which exceeded the rates reported so far. Furthermore, we found 88 SNP markers associated with either the shoot regeneration rate or the shoot ratio. In this association analysis, we found 12 SNP markers from ESTs (expressed sequence tags) matching known candidate genes that are involved in shoot morphogenesis. The best markers explained more than 51% of the variance in the shoot regeneration rate and more than 0.65 of the variance in the shoot regeneration ratio between the homozygote marker classes. The genes underlying some of the best markers such as a GT-transcription factor or an LRR receptor-like protein kinase are novel candidate genes putatively involved in the observed phenotypic differences. The associated markers were mapped to the closely related genome of Fragaria vesca and revealed many distinct clusters, which also comprised the known candidate genes that functioned in the organogenesis of plant shoots. However, the validation of candidate genes and their functional relationship to shoot regeneration require further analysis in independent rose populations and functional analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.