Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28647832›Full record

ArticlePlant cell reports2017

Genetic dissection of adventitious shoot regeneration in roses by employing genome-wide association studies.

Thi Hong Nhung Nguyen, Dietmar Schulz, Traud Winkelmann, Thomas Debener

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant cell reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Thi Hong Nhung NguyenInstitute of Plant Genetics, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Dietmar SchulzInstitute of Plant Genetics, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Traud WinkelmannInstitute of Horticultural Production Systems, Woody Plant and Propagation Physiology, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Thomas DebenerInstitute of Plant Genetics, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany. debener@genetik.uni-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2012-2246
Leibniz University Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageWe analysed the capacity to regenerate adventitious shoots in 96 rose genotypes and found 88 SNP markers associated with QTLs, some of which are derived from candidate genes for shoot regeneration. In an association panel of 96 rose genotypes previously analysed for petal colour, we conducted a genome-wide association study on the capacity of leaf petioles for direct shoot regeneration. Shoot regeneration rate and shoot ratio (number of shoots/total number of explants) were used as phenotypic descriptors for regeneration capacity. Two independent experiments were carried out with six replicates of ten explants each. We found significant variation between the genotypes ranging from 0.88 to 88.33% for the regeneration rate and from 0.008 to 1.2 for the shoot ratio, which exceeded the rates reported so far. Furthermore, we found 88 SNP markers associated with either the shoot regeneration rate or the shoot ratio. In this association analysis, we found 12 SNP markers from ESTs (expressed sequence tags) matching known candidate genes that are involved in shoot morphogenesis. The best markers explained more than 51% of the variance in the shoot regeneration rate and more than 0.65 of the variance in the shoot regeneration ratio between the homozygote marker classes. The genes underlying some of the best markers such as a GT-transcription factor or an LRR receptor-like protein kinase are novel candidate genes putatively involved in the observed phenotypic differences. The associated markers were mapped to the closely related genome of Fragaria vesca and revealed many distinct clusters, which also comprised the known candidate genes that functioned in the organogenesis of plant shoots. However, the validation of candidate genes and their functional relationship to shoot regeneration require further analysis in independent rose populations and functional analyses.

Indexed as

Culture MediaGenome, PlantGenotypePhenotypePlant Growth RegulatorsPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsPlant ShootsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociRegenerationRosaTissue Culture TechniquesTranscription FactorsCulture MediaPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsTranscription FactorsGenome-wide association studyRose cultivarsShoot regenerationSNP markers

Identifiers

PMID28647832
OpenAlexW2666905608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.