Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28647727›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Patients as partners in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A qualitative patient-led study.

Chelsia Gillis, Marlyn Gill, Nancy Marlett, Gail MacKean, Kathy GermAnn, Loreen Gilmour, Gregg Nelson, Tracy Wasylak, Susan Nguyen, Edamil Araujo and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05465499 (Preliminary Survey in Preparation for the Implementation of ERAS at Dr Soetomo Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05465499 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Preliminary Survey in Preparation for the Implementation of ERAS at Dr Soetomo Hospital

TypeobservationalSponsorDr. Soetomo General HospitalRan2022 to 2022Enrolled207ConditionsERASArmsERAS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Nurse-led Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs: Potential Solution to Shorten Postoperative Recovery.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Reporting patient experiences within elective perioperative care: a scoping review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chelsia GillisDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Marlyn GillPaCER Innovates, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nancy MarlettDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Gail MacKeanCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kathy GermAnnDepartment of Independent Health and Human Services Research and Evaluation, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Loreen GilmourERAS Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Gregg NelsonDepartments of Oncology and Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Tracy WasylakAlberta Health Services, Strategic Clinical Networksâ"¢, Alberta, Canada.
Susan NguyenPaCER Innovates, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Edamil AraujoPaCER Innovates, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sandra ZelinskyPaCER Innovates, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Leah GramlichDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 258077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesExplore the experience of patients undergoing colorectal surgery within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme. Use these experiential data to inform the development of a framework to support ongoing, meaningful patient engagement in ERAS.

designQualitative patient-led study using focus groups and narrative interviews. Data were analysed iteratively using a Participatory Grounded Theory approach.

settingFive tertiary care centres in Alberta, Canada, following the ERAS programme.

participantsTwenty-seven patients who had undergone colorectal surgery in the last 12 months were recruited through purposive sampling. Seven patients participated in a codesign focus group to set and prioritise the research direction. Narrative interviews were conducted with 20 patients.

resultsPatients perceived that an ERAS programme should not be limited to the perioperative period, but should encompass the journey from diagnosis to recovery. Practical recommendations to improve the patient experience across the surgical continuum, and enhance patient engagement within ERAS included: (1) fully explain every protocol, and the purpose of the protocol, both before surgery and while in-hospital, so that patients can become knowledgeable partners in their recovery; (2) extend ERAS guidelines to the presurgery phase, so that patients can be ready emotionally, psychologically and physically for surgery; (3) extend ERAS guidelines to the recovery period at home to avoid stressful situations for patients and families; (4) consider activating a programme where experienced patients can provide peer support; (5) one size does not fit all; personalised adaptations within the standardised pathway are required.Drawing upon these data, and through consultation with ERAS Alberta stakeholders, the ERAS team developed a matrix to guide sustained patient involvement and action throughout the surgical care continuum at three levels: individual, unit and ERAS system.

conclusionThis patient-led study generated new insights into the needs of ERAS patients and informed the development of a framework to improve patient experiences and outcomes.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationPerioperative CarePostoperative CareProgram EvaluationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlbertaColonDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedColorectal surgeryQuality in healthcare

Identifiers

PMID28647727
PMCPMC5726093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.