Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28647455›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunological methods2017

Comparison of mucosal lining fluid sampling methods and influenza-specific IgA detection assays for use in human studies of influenza immunity.

Thushan I de Silva, Victoria Gould, Nuredin I Mohammed, Alethea Cope, Adam Meijer, Ilse Zutt, Johan Reimerink, Beate Kampmann, Katja Hoschler, Maria Zambon and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mucosal immunity and vaccine development.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Thushan I de SilvaSection of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, W2 1PG, UK; Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK; Vaccines and Immunity Theme, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia, PO Box 273, Banjul, Gambia. Electronic address: t.de-silva@imperial.ac.uk.
Victoria GouldMucosal infection and Immunity, Section of Virology, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, W2 1PG, UK.
Nuredin I MohammedVaccines and Immunity Theme, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia, PO Box 273, Banjul, Gambia.
Alethea CopeMucosal infection and Immunity, Section of Virology, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, W2 1PG, UK.
Adam MeijerCentre for Infectious Disease Research, Diagnostics and Screening (IDS)/PB22, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Ilse ZuttCentre for Infectious Disease Research, Diagnostics and Screening (IDS)/PB22, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Johan ReimerinkCentre for Infectious Disease Research, Diagnostics and Screening (IDS)/PB22, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Beate KampmannSection of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, W2 1PG, UK; Vaccines and Immunity Theme, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia, PO Box 273, Banjul, Gambia.
Katja HoschlerVirus Reference Department, Reference Microbiology Services, Public Health England, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT, UK.
Maria ZambonVirus Reference Department, Reference Microbiology Services, Public Health England, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT, UK.
John S TregoningMucosal infection and Immunity, Section of Virology, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, W2 1PG, UK.
Imperial College London · GBNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLMRC Unit the Gambia · GMPublic Health England · GBRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_A900_1122Medical Research Council MR/R005990/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 110058/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We need greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying protection against influenza virus to develop more effective vaccines. To do this, we need better, more reproducible methods of sampling the nasal mucosa. The aim of the current study was to compare levels of influenza virus A subtype-specific IgA collected using three different methods of nasal sampling. Samples were collected from healthy adult volunteers before and after LAIV immunization by nasal wash, flocked swabs and Synthetic Absorptive Matrix (SAM) strips. Influenza A virus subtype-specific IgA levels were measured by haemagglutinin binding ELISA or haemagglutinin binding microarray and the functional response was assessed by microneutralization. Nasosorption using SAM strips lead to the recovery of a more concentrated sample of material, with a significantly higher level of total and influenza H1-specific IgA. However, an equivalent percentage of specific IgA was observed with all sampling methods when normalized to the total IgA. Responses measured using a recently developed antibody microarray platform, which allows evaluation of binding to multiple influenza strains simultaneously with small sample volumes, were compared to ELISA. There was a good correlation between ELISA and microarray values. Material recovered from SAM strips was weakly neutralizing when used in an in vitro assay, with a modest correlation between the level of IgA measured by ELISA and neutralization, but a greater correlation between microarray-measured IgA and neutralizing activity. In conclusion we have tested three different methods of nasal sampling and show that flocked swabs and novel SAM strips are appropriate alternatives to traditional nasal washes for assessment of mucosal influenza humoral immunity.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, ViralEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansImmunity, MucosalImmunoglobulin AInfluenza A virusInfluenza VaccinesMaleNasal Lavage FluidNasal MucosaProtein Array AnalysisSpecimen HandlingAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin AInfluenza VaccinesELISAIgANasal

Identifiers

PMID28647455
PMCPMC7619426
OpenAlexW2716477060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.