Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28646373›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2018

Ethical Challenges Unique to the Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) Model.

Christine N Runyan, Stephanie Carter-Henry, Stacy Ogbeide

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christine N RunyanDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. Christine.Runyan@umassmemorial.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0244-5121
Stephanie Carter-HenryDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Stacy OgbeideDepartments of Family and Community Medicine and Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interprofessional nature of the Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model invites potential conflicts between different ethical guidelines and principles developed by separate professional disciplines. When the foundational model of care and training on which ethical principles were developed shifts, the assumptions underlying the guidance also shifts, revealing gaps and mismatches. This article reviews the extant literature in this realm, and proposes a more unifying set of ethical guidance for interprofessional, integrated primary care practice. We discuss common ethical dilemmas unique to the PCBH model through case examples, and then apply the newly proposed ethical guideline model to these cases to illustrate how the newly proposed model can be efficient and effective navigating these dilemmas.

Indexed as

Ethics, MedicalBehavioral MedicineClinical CompetenceConflict of InterestDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedGuideline AdherenceHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationIntersectoral CollaborationPrimary Health CareUnited StatesEthical issues in primary careEthical modelInterprofessional competenciesPrimary care behavioral health model

Identifiers

PMID28646373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.