Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28646282›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2017

Surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

R Vera, L Díez, E Martín Pérez, J C Plaza, A Sanjuanbenito, A Carrato

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

R VeraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, C/de Irunlarrea 3, Planta Baja, 31008, Pamplona, Spain. ruth.vera.garcia@cfnavarra.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0156-0029
L DíezDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
E Martín PérezDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
J C PlazaDepartment of Pathology, Laboratorio de Dianas Terapéuticas, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain.
A SanjuanbenitoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
A CarratoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESHospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical resection is the only potentially curative option in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Preoperative radiological imaging allows to rule out the presence of metastases. Three resectability categories are established based on the radiological findings depending on the degree of contact between the tumor and the blood vessels. Histological confirmation of malignancy is only required in cases of borderline or non-resectable tumors, prior to neoadjuvant treatment initiation. Diagnostic laparoscopy is recommended in the presence of large tumors of the body or tail and in borderline tumors to explore the possibility of resection and to apply treatment with curative intent, as well as in those cases with high level of biomarkers to rule out peritoneal involvement. Prior to surgery preoperative nutritional measures as well as endoscopic biliary drainage can be applied to optimize patient's conditions. Cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy is the recommended surgical technique in tumors located in the head of the pancreas. The benefits from pyloric preservation, type or reconstruction (one vs. two loops), type of anastomosis (pancreaticojejunostomy vs. pancreaticogastrostomy), intraoperative biopsy of the pancreatic resection margin or the use of intraperitoneal drainages are inconclusive. Total pancreatectomy and/or portal resection should only be performed in particular cases; however, arterial resections have shown no benefits. Radical antegrade modular pancreaticosplenectomy, that can be performed laparoscopically, is the technique used for those tumors located in the pancreatic body-tail.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalHumansPancreatic NeoplasmsPathology reportResectability criteriaSurgical approachSurgical risk scales

Identifiers

PMID28646282
OpenAlexW2662648214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.