Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28646249›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2018

Public acceptability of financial incentives to reward pregnant smokers who quit smoking: a United Kingdom-France comparison.

Noémi Berlin, Léontine Goldzahl, Linda Bauld, Pat Hoddinott, Ivan Berlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Promoting healthy behaviour with financial incentives: three challenges and solutions for large scale implementation.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noémi BerlinDepartment of Economics, European University Institute, Villa la Fonte, Via delle Fontanelle, 18, 50014, San Domenico Di Fiesole, Italy. noemi.berlin@eui.eu.
Léontine GoldzahlUniversité Paris-Dauphine, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Linda BauldUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies and Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Pat HoddinottNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Ivan BerlinDepartment of Pharmacology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, Faculté de médecine-Université P. & M. Curie, INSERM U1018, Paris, France.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office NMAHP2Department of Health 10/31/02Health Technology Assessment Programme CRD42012001980Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1Ministère des Affaires Sociales et de la Santé MA0500150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A substantial amount of research has been conducted on financial incentives to increase abstinence from smoking among pregnant smokers. If demonstrated to be effective, financial incentives could be proposed as part of health care interventions to help pregnant smokers quit. Public acceptability is important; as such interventions could be publicly funded. Concerns remain about the acceptability of these interventions in the general population. We aimed to assess the acceptability of financial incentives to reward pregnant smokers who stop smoking using a survey conducted in the UK and then subsequently in France, two developed countries with different cultural and social backgrounds. More French than British respondents agreed with financial incentives for rewarding quitting smoking during pregnancy, not smoking after delivery, keeping a smoke-free household, health service payment for meeting target and the maximum amount of the reward. However, fully adjusted models showed significant differences only for the two latter items. More British than French respondents were neutral toward financial incentives. Differences between the representative samples of French and British individuals demonstrate that implementation of financial incentive policies may not be transferable from one country to another.

Indexed as

Financing, PersonalMotivationPregnancySmoking CessationAdultFemaleFranceHumansRewardSmokersSmokingUnited KingdomYoung AdultAcceptabilityFinancial incentivesPregnant womenSmoking behaviour

Identifiers

PMID28646249
PMCPMC5948294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.