ArticleScientific reports2017
Magnetic resonance imaging of fetal persistent left superior vena cava.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidental noninvasive diagnosis of isolated persistent left superior vena cava in asymptomatic adults: A case report.Medicine · 2026Article
- First- and Second-Trimester Cardiovascular Anomalies in Trisomy 21 Fetuses: Anatomy, Embryology, Genetics and Imaging.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- The role of magnetic resonance imaging in fetal congenital heart disease.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Fetal Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: History, Current Status, and Future Directions.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- The Evolution and Developing Importance of Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Congenital Cardiac Anomalies: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Fetal Cardiac MRI: A Review of Technical Advancements.Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI · 2019Review
- MR imaging of subaortic and retroesophageal anomalous courses of the left brachiocephalic vein in the fetus.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for persistent left superior vena cava (LSVC). Prenatal echocardiography (echo) and/or ultrasound (US) and MRI data for 49 fetuses with persistent LSVC, confirmed via postnatal diagnoses between January 2010 and October 2015, were retrospectively reviewed. All prenatal MRI was performed at 1.5 T. Imaging sequences included steady-state free-precession (SSFP), single-shot turbo spin echo (SSTSE), and other sequences. All 49 cases of fetal persistent LSVC were correctly diagnosed via MRI, but only 34 cases (69.4%) were correctly diagnosed via an initial US and/or echo before MRI. Of the 15 cases that were not correctly diagnosed via US and/or echo, 8 had congenital heart diseases (CHDs) and 7 were without CHDs; however, they were associated with extracardiac abnormalities or maternal obesity. Thirty-five cases were associated with other cardiovascular abnormalities; 8, with extracardiac abnormalities; and 6, with no associated condition. In 44 (89.8%) cases, the innominate veins were absent; the remaining cases had innominate veins. In 14.3% of patients (7 cases), the persistent LSVC drained directly into the atrium. Fetal MRI can detect persistent LSVC and play an adjunctive role along with US in the evaluation of persistent LSVC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.