Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28646095›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open2017

Estimated reductions in provider-initiated preterm births and hospital length of stay under a universal acetylsalicylic acid prophylaxis strategy: a retrospective cohort study.

Joel G Ray, Emily Bartsch, Alison L Park, Prakesh S Shah, Susie Dzakpasu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perinatal Outcomes in Women with Chronic Kidney Diseases.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prepregnancy renal function and risk of preterm birth and related outcomes.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joel G RayAffiliations: Departments of Medicine and of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ray), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; University of Toronto (Bartsch); Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Park); Department of Paediatrics (Shah), Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Toronto, Ont.; Maternal, Child and Youth Health Unit (Dzakpasu), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.
Emily BartschAffiliations: Departments of Medicine and of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ray), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; University of Toronto (Bartsch); Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Park); Department of Paediatrics (Shah), Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Toronto, Ont.; Maternal, Child and Youth Health Unit (Dzakpasu), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.
Alison L ParkAffiliations: Departments of Medicine and of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ray), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; University of Toronto (Bartsch); Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Park); Department of Paediatrics (Shah), Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Toronto, Ont.; Maternal, Child and Youth Health Unit (Dzakpasu), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.
Prakesh S ShahAffiliations: Departments of Medicine and of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ray), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; University of Toronto (Bartsch); Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Park); Department of Paediatrics (Shah), Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Toronto, Ont.; Maternal, Child and Youth Health Unit (Dzakpasu), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.
Susie DzakpasuAffiliations: Departments of Medicine and of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ray), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; University of Toronto (Bartsch); Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Park); Department of Paediatrics (Shah), Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto; Toronto, Ont.; Maternal, Child and Youth Health Unit (Dzakpasu), Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CASinai Hospital · USSt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertensive disorders, especially preeclampsia, are the leading reason for provider-initiated preterm birth. We estimated how universal acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) prophylaxis might reduce rates of provider-initiated preterm birth associated with preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction, which are related conditions.

methodsWe performed a cohort study of singleton hospital births in 2013 in Canada, excluding Quebec. We estimated the proportion of term births and provider-initiated preterm births affected by preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction, and the corresponding mean maternal and newborn hospital length of stay. We projected the potential number of cases reduced and corresponding hospital length of stay if ASA prophylaxis lowered cases of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction by a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 10% (lowest) or 53% (highest), as suggested by randomized clinical trials.

resultsOf the 269 303 singleton live births and stillbirths in our cohort, 4495 (1.7%) were provider-initiated preterm births. Of the 4495, 1512 (33.6%) had a diagnosis of preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction. The mean maternal length of stay was 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-2.0) days among term births unaffected by either condition and 7.3 (95% CI 6.1-8.6) days among provider-initiated preterm births with both conditions. The corresponding values for mean newborn length of stay were 1.9 (95% CI 1.8-1.9) days and 21.8 (95% CI 17.4-26.2) days. If ASA conferred a 53% RRR against preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction, 3365 maternal and 11 591 newborn days in hospital would be averted. If ASA conferred a 10% RRR, 635 maternal and 2187 newborn days in hospital would be averted.

interpretationA universal ASA prophylaxis strategy could substantially reduce the burden of long maternal and newborn hospital stays associated with provider-initiated preterm birth. However, until there is compelling evidence that administration of ASA to all, or most, pregnant women reduces the risk of preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction, clinicians should continue to follow current clinical practice guidelines.

Identifiers

PMID28646095
PMCPMC5498311
OpenAlexW2633693266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.