Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28645982›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

A multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing nasal high flow with nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary support for newborn infants with early respiratory distress born in Australian non-tertiary special care nurseries (the HUNTER trial): study protocol.

Brett J Manley, Calum T Roberts, Gaston R B Arnolda, Ian M R Wright, Louise S Owen, Kim M Dalziel, Jann P Foster, Peter G Davis, Adam G Buckmaster

Open access · goldAbstract readEquivalence TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in term infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Vascular device practices in extremely preterm infants: an international cross-sectional survey.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Brett J ManleyNeonatal Services and Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Calum T RobertsNeonatal Services and Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Gaston R B ArnoldaDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ian M R WrightIllawarra Health and Medical Research Institute and Graduate Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Louise S OwenNeonatal Services and Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Kim M DalzielCentre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Global and Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Jann P FosterSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Peter G DavisNeonatal Services and Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Adam G BuckmasterPaediatrics and Child Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUCentral Coast Local Health District · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AUWestern Sydney University · AUWollongong Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNasal high-flow (nHF) therapy is a popular mode of respiratory support for newborn infants. Evidence for nHF use is predominantly from neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). There are no randomised trials of nHF use in non-tertiary special care nurseries (SCNs). We hypothesise that nHF is non-inferior to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as primary support for newborn infants with respiratory distress, in the population cared for in non-tertiary SCNs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The HUNTER trial is an unblinded Australian multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Infants are eligible if born at a gestational age ≥31 weeks with birth weight ≥1200 g and admitted to a participating non-tertiary SCN, are <24 hours old at randomisation and require non-invasive respiratory support or supplemental oxygen for >1 hour. Infants are randomised to treatment with either nHF or CPAP. The primary outcome is treatment failure within 72 hours of randomisation, as determined by objective oxygenation, apnoea or blood gas criteria or by a clinical decision that urgent intubation and mechanical ventilation, or transfer to a tertiary NICU, is required. Secondary outcomes include incidence of pneumothorax requiring drainage, duration of respiratory support, supplemental oxygen and hospitalisation, costs associated with hospital care, cost-effectiveness, parental stress and satisfaction and nursing workload. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Multisite ethical approval for the study has been granted by The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (Trial Reference No. 34222), and by each participating site. The trial is currently recruiting in eight centres in Victoria and New South Wales, Australia, with one previous site no longer recruiting. The trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12614001203640; pre-results.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureAcidosis, RespiratoryAdministration, IntranasalContinuous Positive Airway PressureFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleNew South WalesOxygenOxygen Inhalation TherapyResearch DesignRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornOxygenneonatologypaediatricsperinatology

Identifiers

PMID28645982
PMCPMC5541635
OpenAlexW2635102996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.