Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28645976›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

A combined randomised and observational study of surgery for fractures in the distal radius in the elderly (CROSSFIRE)-a study protocol.

Ian A Harris, Justine M Naylor, Andrew Lawson, Rachelle Buchbinder, Rebecca Ivers, Zsolt Balogh, Paul Smith, Rajat Mittal, Wei Xuan, Kirsten Howard and 21 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Distal radius fractures : Current treatment concepts and controversies].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.

Ian A HarrisIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Sydney, Australia.
Justine M NaylorIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Sydney, Australia.
Andrew LawsonIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1367-6443
Rachelle BuchbinderMonash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Rebecca IversThe George Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Zsolt BaloghJohn Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.
Paul SmithCanberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia.
Rajat MittalUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Wei XuanIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
Kirsten HowardUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Arezoo VafaIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
Piers YatesFiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Bertram RiegerFiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Geoff SmithSt George and Sutherland Hospitals, Sydney, Australia.
Ilia ElkinsonWellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.
Woosung KimWellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.
Mellick ChehadeRoyal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Jai SungaranConcord Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Kim LatendresseNambour Hospital and Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Nambour, Australia.
James WongWestmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Sameer ViswanathanCampbelltown Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Martin RichardsonEpworth Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Kush ShresthaDarwin Hospital, Darwin, Australia.
Herwig DrobetzMackay Base Hospital, Mackay, Australia.
Phong TranWestern Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Jeremy LoveridgeCairns Hospital, Cairns, Australia.
Richard PageUniversity Hospital Geelong/Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Raphael HauNorthern Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Roger BinghamSt Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Jonathan MulfordLaunceston Hospital, Launceston, Australia.
Ian IncollGosford and Wyong Hospitals, Gosford, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUFiona Stanley Hospital · AUIngham Institute · AUThe University of Sydney · AUWellington Hospital · NZBarwon Health · AUCabrini Hospital · AUCairns Hospital · AUCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AUCanberra Hospital · AUConcord Repatriation General Hospital · AUEpworth Hospital · AUGosford Hospital · AUJohn Hunter Hospital · AULaunceston General Hospital · AUMackay Base Hospital · AUNorthern Health · AURoyal Adelaide Hospital · AURoyal Darwin Hospital · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fractures of the distal radius are common and occur in all age groups. The incidence is high in older populations due to osteoporosis and increased falls risk. Considerable practice variation exists in the management of distal radius fractures in older patients ranging from closed reduction with cast immobilisation to open reduction with plate fixation. Plating is currently the most common surgical treatment. While there is evidence showing no significant advantage for some forms of surgical fixation over conservative treatment, and no difference between different surgical techniques, there is a lack of evidence comparing two of the most common treatments used: closed reduction and casting versus plating. Surgical management involves significant costs and risks compared with conservative management. High-level evidence is required to address practice variation, justify costs and to provide the best clinical outcomes for patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This pragmatic, multicentre randomised comparative effectiveness trial aims to determine whether plating leads to better pain and function and is more cost-effective than closed reduction and casting of displaced distal radius fractures in adults aged 60 years and older. The trial will compare the two techniques but will also follow consenting patients who are unwilling to be randomised in a separate, observational cohort. Inclusion of non-randomised patients addresses selection bias, provides practice and outcome insights about standard care, and improves the generalisability of the results from the randomised trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: CROSSFIRE(Combined Randomised and Observational Study of Surgery for Fractures In the distal Radius in the Elderly) was reviewed and approved by The Hunter New England HREC (HNEHREC Reference No: 16/02/17/3.04). The results of the trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be disseminated via various forms of media. Results will be incorporated in clinical recommendations and practice guidelines produced by professional bodies. REGISTRATION: CROSSFIRE has been registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR: ACTRN12616000969460).

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneRadiusAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaBone PlatesComparative Effectiveness ResearchDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicPain MeasurementAgedCost-benefitFracture FixationPatientReported OutcomeRadius Fractures

Identifiers

PMID28645976
PMCPMC5541521
OpenAlexW2646513873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.