Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28645844›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage2018

Modeling and interpreting mesoscale network dynamics.

Ankit N Khambhati, Ann E Sizemore, Richard F Betzel, Danielle S Bassett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Towards a biologically annotated brain connectome.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  10. The fractal brain: scale-invariance in structure and dynamics.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Supervising the Decoder of Variational Autoencoders to Improve Scientific Utility.IEEE transactions on signal processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society · 2022
    Article
  15. Theoretical foundations of studying criticality in the brain.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Time-Varying Functional Connectivity Decreases as a Function of Acute Nicotine Abstinence.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ankit N KhambhatiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeautics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Ann E SizemoreDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Richard F BetzelDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Danielle S BassettDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeautics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: dsb@seas.upenn.edu.

Funding

Virtual Resection to Treat EpilepsyR01NS099348 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH, LITT, BRIAN · 2016 to 2019
$2.3M
Evolution of the Linked Architecture of Network Control and Executive Function in AdolescenceR21MH106799 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH, SATTERTHWAITE, THEODORE · 2016 to 2017
$515k
CRCNS: US-France Modeling & Predicting BCI Learning from Dynamic NetworksR01HD086888 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH · 2015 to 2018
$506k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086888NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH106799NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in brain imaging techniques, measurement approaches, and storage capacities have provided an unprecedented supply of high temporal resolution neural data. These data present a remarkable opportunity to gain a mechanistic understanding not just of circuit structure, but also of circuit dynamics, and its role in cognition and disease. Such understanding necessitates a description of the raw observations, and a delineation of computational models and mathematical theories that accurately capture fundamental principles behind the observations. Here we review recent advances in a range of modeling approaches that embrace the temporally-evolving interconnected structure of the brain and summarize that structure in a dynamic graph. We describe recent efforts to model dynamic patterns of connectivity, dynamic patterns of activity, and patterns of activity atop connectivity. In the context of these models, we review important considerations in statistical testing, including parametric and non-parametric approaches. Finally, we offer thoughts on careful and accurate interpretation of dynamic graph architecture, and outline important future directions for method development.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalBrainBrain MappingHumansNerve Net

Identifiers

PMID28645844
PMCPMC5738302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.