Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28645376›Full record

ReviewMethods in enzymology2017

Proteomic Analyses of the Eukaryotic Replication Machinery.

David Cortez

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in enzymology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cellular Responses to Widespread DNA Replication Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Histone dynamics during DNA replication stress.Journal of biomedical science · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David CortezVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States. Electronic address: david.cortez@vanderbilt.edu.
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Analysis of the Replication Stress ResponseR01GM116616 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI David K Cortez · 2015 to 2026
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA replication in a human cell involves hundreds of proteins that copy the DNA accurately and completely each cell division cycle. In addition to the core DNA copying machine (the replisome), accessory proteins work to respond to replication stress, correct errors, and repackage the DNA into appropriate chromatin structures. New proteomic tools have been invented in the past few years to facilitate the purification, identification, and quantification of the replication, chromatin maturation, and replication stress response machineries. These tools, including iPOND (isolation of proteins on nascent DNA) and NCC (nascent chromatin capture), have yielded discoveries of new proteins involved in these processes and insights into the dynamic regulatory processes ensuring genome and chromatin integrity. In this review, I will introduce these experimental approaches and examine how they have been utilized to define the replication fork proteome.

Indexed as

ProteomicsDNADNA ReplicationHumansProteinsDNAProteinsChromatinDNA replicationiPONDMass spectrometryNascent chromatin captureProteomicsReplication stressReplisomeSILAC

Identifiers

PMID28645376
PMCPMC5962280
OpenAlexW2604548127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.