Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28645323›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Early response index: a statistic to discover potential early stage disease biomarkers.

Sirajul Salekin, Mehrab Ghanat Bari, Itay Raphael, Thomas G Forsthuber, Jianqiu Michelle Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sirajul SalekinDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78207, USA. Sirajul.Salekin@utsa.edu.
Mehrab Ghanat BariDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, MN, Rochester, 55905, USA.
Itay RaphaelDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78207, USA.
Thomas G ForsthuberDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78207, USA.
Jianqiu Michelle ZhangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78207, USA.
The University of Texas at San Antonio · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

RCMI Center for Interdiscplinary Health Research CIHRG12MD007591 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI PERRY, GEORGE · 2012 to 2016
$10.4M
Predictive biomarkers for EAE developmentR21NS084201 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI FORSTHUBER, THOMAS G. · 2014 to 2015
$404k
NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007591NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS084201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying disease correlated features early before large number of molecules are impacted by disease progression with significant abundance change is very advantageous to biologists for developing early disease diagnosis biomarkers. Disease correlated features have relatively low level of abundance change at early stages. Finding them using existing bioinformatic tools in high throughput data is a challenging task since the technology suffers from limited dynamic range and significant noise. Most existing biomarker discovery algorithms can only detect molecules with high abundance changes, frequently missing early disease diagnostic markers.

resultsWe present a new statistic called early response index (ERI) to prioritize disease correlated molecules as potential early biomarkers. Instead of classification accuracy, ERI measures the average classification accuracy improvement attainable by a feature when it is united with other counterparts for classification. ERI is more sensitive to abundance changes than other ranking statistics. We have shown that ERI significantly outperforms SAM and Localfdr in detecting early responding molecules in a proteomics study of a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Importantly, ERI was able to detect many disease relevant proteins before those algorithms detect them at a later time point.

conclusionsERI method is more sensitive for significant feature detection during early stage of disease development. It potentially has a higher specificity for biomarker discovery, and can be used to identify critical time frame for disease intervention.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBiomarkersCentral Nervous SystemEarly DiagnosisMiceMultiple SclerosisProteomeProteomicsTime FactorsBiomarkersProteomeBiomarker discoveryDisease correlated featuresEarly stage of diseaseFeature selectionGene/protein expression changeMultiple Sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID28645323
PMCPMC5481992
OpenAlexW2652603582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.