Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28645301›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

The Sternal Management Accelerated Recovery Trial (S.M.A.R.T) - standard restrictive versus an intervention of modified sternal precautions following cardiac surgery via median sternotomy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Md Ali Katijjahbe, Linda Denehy, Catherine L Granger, Alistair Royse, Colin Royse, Rebecca Bates, Sarah Logie, Sandy Clarke, Doa El-Ansary

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. BMJ open · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Md Ali KatijjahbeDepartment of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3053, Australia. kmd@student.unimelb.edu.au.
Linda DenehyDepartment of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3053, Australia.
Catherine L GrangerDepartment of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3053, Australia.
Alistair RoyseDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Colin RoyseDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Rebecca BatesDepartment of Physiotherapy, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia.
Sarah LogiePhysiotherapy Department, Melbourne Private Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Sandy ClarkeStatistical Consulting Centre, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Doa El-AnsaryDepartment of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3053, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUSt Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe routine implementation of sternal precautions to prevent sternal complications that restrict the use of the upper limbs is currently worldwide practice following a median sternotomy. However, evidence is limited and drawn primarily from cadaver studies and orthopaedic research. Sternal precautions may delay recovery, prolong hospital discharge and be overly restrictive. Recent research has shown that upper limb exercise reduces post-operative sternal pain and results in minimal micromotion between the sternal edges as measured by ultrasound. The aims of this study are to evaluate the effects of modified sternal precautions on physical function, pain, recovery and health-related quality of life after cardiac surgery. METHODS/

designThis study is a phase II, double-blind, randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinding of patients and assessors, and intention-to-treat analysis. Patients (n = 72) will be recruited following cardiac surgery via a median sternotomy. Sample size calculations were based on the minimal important difference (two points) for the primary outcome: Short Physical Performance Battery. Thirty-six participants are required per group to counter dropout (20%). All participants will be randomised to receive either standard or modified sternal precautions. The intervention group will receive guidelines encouraging the safe use of the upper limbs. Secondary outcomes are upper limb function, pain, kinesiophobia and health-related quality of life. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarise data. The primary hypothesis will be examined by repeated-measures analysis of variance to evaluate the changes from baseline to 4 weeks post-operatively in the intervention arm compared with the usual-care arm. In all tests to be conducted, a p value <0.05 (two-tailed) will be considered statistically significant, and confidence intervals will be reported. DISCUSSION: The Sternal Management Accelerated Recovery Trial (S.M.A.R.T.) is a two-centre randomised controlled trial powered and designed to investigate whether the effects of modifying sternal precautions to include the safe use of the upper limbs and trunk impact patients' physical function and recovery following cardiac surgery via median sternotomy.

trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry identifier: ACTRN12615000968572 . Registered on 16 September 2015 (prospectively registered).

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresSternotomyBiomechanical PhenomenaClinical ProtocolsDouble-Blind MethodHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisLength of StayPain MeasurementPostoperative PainProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsCardiac SurgeryMedian SternotomyPhysiotherapyRandomised controlled trialSternal Precautions

Identifiers

PMID28645301
PMCPMC5481951
OpenAlexW2631663259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.