ArticleBMC genomics2017
Transcriptomic dynamics in soybean near-isogenic lines differing in alleles for an aphid resistance gene, following infestation by soybean aphid biotype 2.
Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic analysis reveals candidate molecular pathways involved in pea (Pisum sativum L.) resistance to pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris) biotypes.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Molecular Interactions Between Plants and Aphids: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.Insects · 2024Review
- Heat Stress and Plant-Biotic Interactions: Advances and Perspectives.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Evaluation of aphid resistance on different rose cultivars and transcriptome analysis in response to aphid infestation.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Transcriptome analysis of aphid-resistant and susceptible near isogenic lines reveals candidate resistance genes in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata).BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- Identification of Candidate Genes for a Major Quantitative Disease Resistance Locus From Soybean PI 427105B for Resistance toFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Fine Mapping and Characterization of an Aphid-Resistance Gene in the Soybean Landrace Fangzheng Moshidou.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Interaction between Rag genes results in a unique synergistic transcriptional response that enhances soybean resistance to soybean aphids.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- The Source ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Differential Defense Responses of Upland and Lowland Switchgrass Cultivars to a Cereal Aphid Pest.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- The Resistant Soybean-Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- The ability to manipulate ROS metabolism in pepper may affect aphid virulence.Horticulture research · 2020Article
- Molecular Basis of Soybean Resistance to Soybean Aphids and Soybean Cyst Nematodes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Transcriptional and Chemical Changes in Soybean Leaves in Response to Long-Term Aphid Colonization.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- Plant Genes Benefitting Aphids-Potential for Exploitation in Resistance Breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Review
- Effects of sugarcane aphid herbivory on transcriptional responses of resistant and susceptible sorghum.BMC genomics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenetic resistance of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] against Aphis glycines provides effective management of this invasive pest, though the underlying molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. This study aimed to investigate genome-wide changes in gene expressions of soybean near-isogenic lines (NILs) either with the Rag5 allele for resistance or the rag5 allele for susceptibility to the aphid following infestation with soybean aphid biotype 2.
resultsThe resistant (R)-NIL responded more rapidly to aphid infestation than the susceptible (S)-NIL, with differential expressions of 2496 genes during first 12 h of infestation (hai), compared to the aphid-free control. Although the majority of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the R-NIL also responded to aphid infestation in S-NIL, overall the response time was longer and/or the magnitude of change was smaller in the S-NIL. In addition, 915 DEGs in R-NIL continued to be regulated at all time points (0, 6, 12, and 48 hai), while only 20 DEGs did so in S-NIL. Enriched gene ontology of the 2496 DEGs involved in plant defense responses including primary metabolite catalysis, oxidative stress reduction, and phytohormone-related signaling. By comparing R- vs. S-NIL, a total of 556 DEGs were identified. Of the 13 genes annotated in a 120-kb window of the Rag5 locus, two genes (Glyma.13 g190200 and Glyma.13 g190600) were differentially expressed (upregulated in S- or R-NIL), and another gene (Glyma.13 g190500) was induced up to 4-fold in the R-NIL at 6 and 12 h following aphid infestation.
conclusionsThis study strengthens our understanding of the defense dynamics in compatible and incompatible interactions of soybean and soybean aphid biotype 2. Several DEGs (e.g., Glyma.13 g190200, Glyma.13 g190500, and Glyma.13 g190600) near the Rag5 locus are strong candidate genes for further investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.