Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28645205›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery2018

Aquaporin Positron Emission Tomography Differentiates Between Grade III and IV Human Astrocytoma.

Yuji Suzuki, Yukihiro Nakamura, Kenichi Yamada, Satoshi Kurabe, Kouichirou Okamoto, Hiroshi Aoki, Hiroki Kitaura, Akiyoshi Kakita, Yukihiko Fujii, Vincent J Huber and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Efficient one-pot radiosynthesis of theEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. In vivo methods for imaging blood-brain barrier function and dysfunction.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yuji SuzukiCenter for Integrated Human Brain Sci-ence, Brain Research Institute, University of Niigata, Niigata, Japan.
Yukihiro NakamuraCenter for Integrated Human Brain Sci-ence, Brain Research Institute, University of Niigata, Niigata, Japan.
Kenichi YamadaCenter for Integrated Human Brain Sci-ence, Brain Research Institute, University of Niigata, Niigata, Japan.
Satoshi KurabeCenter for Integrated Human Brain Sci-ence, Brain Research Institute, University of Niigata, Niigata, Japan.
Kouichirou OkamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Ins-titute, University of Niigata, Niigata, Japan.
Hiroshi AokiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Ins-titute, University of Niigata, Niigata, Japan.
Hiroki KitauraCenter for Integrated Human Brain Sci-ence, Brain Research Institute, University of Niigata, Niigata, Japan.
Akiyoshi KakitaDepartment of Pathology, Brain Research Institute, University of Niigata, Niigata, Japan.
Yukihiko FujiiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Ins-titute, University of Niigata, Niigata, Japan.
Vincent J HuberCenter for Integrated Human Brain Sci-ence, Brain Research Institute, University of Niigata, Niigata, Japan.
Hironaka IgarashiCenter for Integrated Human Brain Sci-ence, Brain Research Institute, University of Niigata, Niigata, Japan.
Ingrid L KweeDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.
Tsutomu NakadaCenter for Integrated Human Brain Sci-ence, Brain Research Institute, University of Niigata, Niigata, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAquaporin (AQP) water channels play a significant role in mesenchymal microvascular proliferation and infiltrative growth. AQPs are highly expressed in malignant astrocytomas, and a positive correlation is observed between their expression levels and histological tumor grade.

objectiveTo examine the utility of aquaporin positron emission tomography (PET) for differentiating between astrocytoma grade III and grade IV using the AQP radioligand [11C]TGN-020.

methodsFifteen astrocytoma patients, grade III (n = 7) and grade IV (n = 8), and 10 healthy volunteers underwent [11C]TGN-020 aquaporin PET imaging. Surgical tissues of astrocytoma patients were examined for histopathological grading using the WHO classification standard and expression of AQP1 and AQP4 immunohistochemically.

resultsMean standardized uptake values of astrocytoma grade III and IV (0.51 ± 0.11 vs 1.50 ± 0.44, respectively) were higher than normal white matter (0.17 ± 0.02, P < .001) for both tumor grades. Importantly, mean standardized uptake values of astrocytoma grade IV were significantly higher than grade III (P < .01).

conclusionOur study demonstrated that [11C]TGN-020 aquaporin PET imaging differentiated between astrocytoma grades III and IV. We suggest its clinical application as a noninvasive diagnostic tool would lead to advancements in the management of these malignant brain tumors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAquaporinsAstrocytomaBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeuroimagingNiacinamidePositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticals2-(nicotinamide)-1,3,4-thiadiazoleAquaporinsBiomarkers, TumorNiacinamideRadiopharmaceuticalsThiadiazoles

Identifiers

PMID28645205
PMCPMC5952963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.