Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28645064›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2017

Heroin and saccharin demand and preference in rats.

Lindsay P Schwartz, Jung S Kim, Alan Silberberg, David N Kearns

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Animal Models of the Behavioral Symptoms of Substance Use Disorders.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Pharmacokinetics trumps pharmacodynamics during cocaine choice: a reconciliation with the dopamine hypothesis of addiction.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The effect of economy type on heroin and saccharin essential value.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
  17. Sex differences in opioid reinforcement under a fentanyl vs. food choice procedure in rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lindsay P SchwartzPsychology Department, American University, Washington, DC, United States.
Jung S KimPsychology Department, American University, Washington, DC, United States.
Alan SilberbergPsychology Department, American University, Washington, DC, United States.
David N KearnsPsychology Department, American University, Washington, DC, United States. Electronic address: kearns@american.edu.
American University · US

Funding

Addiction as Maladaptive Choice of Drugs over Non-Drug RewardsR01DA037269 · NIDA · AMERICAN UNIVERSITY · PI KEARNS, DAVID N · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral recent studies have investigated the choice between heroin and a non-drug alternative reinforcer in rats. A common finding in these studies is that there are large individual differences in preference, with some rats preferring heroin and some preferring the non-drug alternative. The primary goal of the present study was to determine whether individual differences in how heroin or saccharin is valued, based on demand analysis, predicts choice.

methodsRats lever-pressed for heroin infusions and saccharin reinforcers on fixed-ratio schedules. The essential value of each reinforcer was obtained from resulting demand curves. Rats were then trained on a mutually exclusive choice procedure where pressing one lever resulted in heroin and pressing another resulted in saccharin. After seven sessions of increased access to heroin or saccharin, rats were reexposed to the demand and choice procedures.

resultsDemand for heroin was more elastic than demand for saccharin (i.e., heroin had lower essential value than saccharin). When allowed to choose, most rats preferred saccharin. The essential value of heroin, but not saccharin, predicted preference. The essential value of both heroin and saccharin increased following a week of increased access to heroin, but similar saccharin exposure had no effect on essential value. Preference was unchanged after increased access to either reinforcer.

conclusionHeroin-preferring rats differed from saccharin-preferring rats in how they valued heroin, but not saccharin. To the extent that choice models addiction-related behavior, these results suggest that overvaluation of opioids specifically, rather than undervaluation of non-drug alternatives, could identify susceptible individuals.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AddictiveChoice BehaviorHeroinMaleRatsSaccharinHeroinSaccharinChoiceDemandEssential valueHeroin self-administrationRatsSaccharin

Identifiers

PMID28645064
PMCPMC5548646
OpenAlexW2626653304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.