Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28644557›Full record

SynthesisOrthopaedic surgery2017

Selective Arterial Embolization for the Treatment of Sacral and Pelvic Giant Cell Tumor: A Systematic Review.

Shao-Hui He, Wei Xu, Zheng-Wang Sun, Wei-Bo Liu, Yu-Jie Liu, Hai-Feng Wei, Jian-Ru Xiao

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Orthopaedic surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Giant cell tumor of the sacrum.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Axial giant cell tumor - current standard of practice.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shao-Hui HeDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology, Spinal Tumor Center, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Wei XuDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology, Spinal Tumor Center, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zheng-Wang SunDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology, Spinal Tumor Center, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Wei-Bo LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology, Spinal Tumor Center, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Jie LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology, Spinal Tumor Center, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Hai-Feng WeiDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology, Spinal Tumor Center, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jian-Ru XiaoDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology, Spinal Tumor Center, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Second Military Medical University · CNQingdao University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant cell tumor of the bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive tumor with a certain distant metastatic rate. For sacral GCT (SGCT) and pelvic GCT (PGCT), surgery has its limitations, especially for unresectable or recurrent tumors. Selective arterial embolization (SAE) is reported to be an option for treatment in several cases, but there are few systematic reviews on the effects of SAE on SGCT and/or PGCT. Medline and Embase databases were searched for eligible English articles. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were conducted before searching. All the clinical factors were measured by SPSS software, with P-values ≤0.05 considered statistically significant. A total of 9 articles were retrieved, including 44 patients receiving SAE ranging from 1 to 10 times. During the mean follow-up period of 85.8 months, the radiographic response rate was 81.8%, with a local control and overall survival rate of 75% and 81.8%, respectively. No bowel, bladder, or sexual dysfunction was observed. Three patients developed distant metastases and finally died. Patients with primary tumors tended to have better prognosis than those with recurrence (P = 0.039). The favorable outcomes of SAE suggest that it may be an alternative treatment for SGCT and PGCT patients for whom surgery is not appropriate.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBone NeoplasmsEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleGiant Cell Tumor of BoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedPelvic BonesPelvic NeoplasmsSacrumSpinal NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultLocal controlOverall survivalPelvisSacral giant cell tumorSelective arterial embolization

Identifiers

PMID28644557
PMCPMC6584703
OpenAlexW2638621300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.