Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28644006›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2017

Structure of the Forkhead Domain of FOXA2 Bound to a Complete DNA Consensus Site.

Jun Li, Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Ming Guo, Jared M Sagendorf, Zhan Zhou, Longying Jiang, Xiaojuan Chen, Daichao Wu, Lingzhi Qu, Zhuchu Chen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An Insight into Vital Genes Responsible for β-cell Formation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Correlation Between High Expression of FOXA2 and Improved Overall Survival in Ovarian Cancer Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jun LiKey Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics of Chinese Ministry of Health and Laboratory of Structural Biology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.
Ana Carolina Dantas MachadoMolecular and Computational Biology Program, Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, California 90089, United States.
Ming GuoKey Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics of Chinese Ministry of Health and Laboratory of Structural Biology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.
Jared M SagendorfMolecular and Computational Biology Program, Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, California 90089, United States.
Zhan ZhouKey Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics of Chinese Ministry of Health and Laboratory of Structural Biology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.
Longying JiangKey Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics of Chinese Ministry of Health and Laboratory of Structural Biology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.
Xiaojuan ChenKey Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics of Chinese Ministry of Health and Laboratory of Structural Biology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.
Daichao WuKey Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics of Chinese Ministry of Health and Laboratory of Structural Biology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.
Lingzhi QuKey Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics of Chinese Ministry of Health and Laboratory of Structural Biology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.
Zhuchu ChenKey Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics of Chinese Ministry of Health and Laboratory of Structural Biology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.
Lin ChenKey Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics of Chinese Ministry of Health and Laboratory of Structural Biology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.
Remo RohsMolecular and Computational Biology Program, Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, California 90089, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1752-1884
Yongheng ChenKey Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics of Chinese Ministry of Health and Laboratory of Structural Biology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8139-6892
Central South University · CNUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Structural and Functional Versatility of NFATR01GM064642 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHEN, LIN · 2005 to 2014
$2.5M
Multi-scale modeling of genetic variation in a developmental networkU01GM103804 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DEPACE, ANGELA H, MARJORAM, PAUL · 2013 to 2016
$2.0M
Explore FOXP3's role in the 3D organization of the genomeR01AI113009 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHEN, LIN · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Genome analysis based on the integration of DNA sequence and shapeR01GM106056 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ROHS, REMO · 2014 to 2017
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI113009NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064642NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106056NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM103804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FOXA2, a member of the forkhead family of transcription factors, plays essential roles in liver development and bile acid homeostasis. In this study, we report a 2.8 Å co-crystal structure of the FOXA2 DNA-binding domain (FOXA2-DBD) bound to a DNA duplex containing a forkhead consensus binding site (GTAAACA). The FOXA2-DBD adopts the canonical winged-helix fold, with helix H3 and wing 1 regions mainly mediating the DNA recognition. Although the wing 2 region was not defined in the structure, isothermal titration calorimetry assays suggested that this region was required for optimal DNA binding. Structure comparison with the FOXA3-DBD bound to DNA revealed more major groove contacts and fewer minor groove contacts in the FOXA2 structure than in the FOXA3 structure. Structure comparison with the FOXO1-DBD bound to DNA showed that different forkhead proteins could induce different DNA conformations upon binding to identical DNA sequences. Our findings provide the structural basis for FOXA2 protein binding to a consensus forkhead site and elucidate how members of the forkhead protein family bind different DNA sites.

Indexed as

Nucleotide MotifsCrystallography, X-RayDNAHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-betaHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-gammaHumansProtein BindingProtein DomainsStructural Homology, ProteinDNAFOXA2 protein, humanFOXA3 protein, humanHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-betaHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-gamma

Identifiers

PMID28644006
PMCPMC5614898
OpenAlexW2642405251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.