ReviewClinical kidney journal2017
Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Part I.
Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03870542 (Multicenter, Prospective Observational Study to Identify and Validate a Composite of Urinary Exosomal Biomarkers for Kidney Allograft Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicenter, Prospective Observational Study to Identify and Validate a Composite of Urinary Exosomal Biomarkers for Kidney Allograft Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiparametric functional MRI for detection of early renal allograft dysfunction after kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC nephrology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Advancements in noninvasive techniques for transplant rejection: from biomarker detection to molecular imaging.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- The uptake of [Frontiers in transplantation · 2023Article
- Patient Specific Numerical Modeling for Renal Blood Monitoring Using Electrical Bio-Impedance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Most Promising Biomarkers of Allogeneic Kidney Transplant Rejection.Journal of immunology research · 2022Review
- [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Non-invasive molecular imaging of kidney diseases.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2021Review
- Color Doppler Ultrasound and Hemodynamics for Evaluating Graft Dysfunction in Recurrent Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy.Annals of transplantation · 2021Article
- Current status of imaging diagnosis in the transplanted kidney. A review of the literature with a special focus on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2020Review
- Circular RNAs as diagnostic tool for renal transplant patients with acute rejection.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- Toward Rapid Noninvasive Measurement of Kidney Perfusion.Radiology · 2019Article
- The next era of renal radionuclide imaging: novel PET radiotracers.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Review
- "Acute kidney dysfunction with no rejection" is associated with poor renal outcomes at 2 years post kidney transplantation.BMC nephrology · 2019Article
- Update on imaging-based diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Review
- Page Kidney: An Unusual Complication of a Renal Transplant Biopsy.Case reports in urology · 2018Article
- Looking for the needle in the kidney transplantation haystack.Clinical kidney journal · 2017Article
- Assessment of Individual Renal Function UsingIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kidney transplantation (KTx) represents the best available treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Still, full benefits of KTx are undermined by acute rejection (AR). The diagnosis of AR ultimately relies on transplant needle biopsy. However, such an invasive procedure is associated with a significant risk of complications and is limited by sampling error and interobserver variability. In the present review, we summarize the current literature about non-invasive approaches for the diagnosis of AR in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), including
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.