Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28643708›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2017

Residency evaluation and adherence design study: Young ophthalmologists' perception of their residency programs - Clinical and surgical skills.

Parikshit Gogate, Partha Biswas, Sundaram Natarajan, Dandapani Ramamurthy, Debashish Bhattacharya, Karl Golnik, Barun Kumar Nayak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ophthalmic exam and ophthalmology residents' subspecialty preference.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Parikshit GogateAll India Ophthalmology Society, New Delhi; Padmashree Dr D Y Patil Medical College; Dr. Gogate's Eye Clinic, Community Eye Care Foundation, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Partha BiswasAll India Ophthalmology Society, New Delhi; BB Eye Foundation, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Sundaram NatarajanAll India Ophthalmology Society, New Delhi; Aditya Jyot Eye Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Dandapani RamamurthyAll India Ophthalmology Society, New Delhi; The Eye Foundation, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Debashish BhattacharyaAll India Ophthalmology Society, New Delhi; Disha Eye Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Karl GolnikAll India Ophthalmology Society, New Delhi, India; Cincinnati Eye Institute, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Barun Kumar NayakAll India Ophthalmology Society, New Delhi; Department of Ophthalmology, Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResidency training is the basis of good clinical and surgical practice. PURPOSE: The aim is to know the demographics, training experience, and perception of young ophthalmologists to improve the present residency programs in India.

settingYoung ophthalmologists trained in India.

methodsA survey was conducted by the Academic and Research Committee of the All India Ophthalmology Society, in 2014-2016 of young ophthalmologists (those trained between 2002 and 2012, with 2-10 years' postresidency experience) to gauge teaching of clinical and surgical skills during the postgraduate residency program. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 16.

resultsOf the 1005 respondents, 531 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Average age was 32.6 years (standard deviation [SD] 4). On a scale of 0-10, clinical skills teaching was graded as (mean, SD): Slit lamp examination (7.2, SD 2.8), indirect ophthalmoscopy (6.2, SD 3.3), gonioscopy (5.7, SD 3.4), perimetry (6.2, SD 3.2), optical coherence tomography (4.6, SD 4), and orthoptic evaluation (4.3, SD 3.1). The mean (SD) and median of surgeries performed independently was intracapsular cataract extraction 3.0 (14.9), 0; extracapsular cataract extraction 39.9 (53.2), 18; small incision cataract surgery 75.3 (64.4), 55; phacoemulsification 30 (52.6), 1; pterygium excision 31.5 (43.5), 15; dacryocystectomy 20.3 (38.1), 4; dacryocystorhinostomy 11.7 (26.2), 2; chalazion 46.4 (48.3), 30; trabeculectomies 4 (14.9), 0; strabismus correction 1.4 (4.9), 0; laser-assisted in situ Keratomileusis 1.5 (12.2), 0; retinal detachment 1.5 (12.5), 0; vitrectomy 3.0 (17.0), 0; keratoplasty 5.2 (17.8), 0; eyelid surgery 8.6 (18.9), 2 and ocular emergencies 41.7 (52.4), 20. Observed and assisted surgeries were more common. However, the range of grading was 0-10 in all categories.

conclusionResidency training in India varies considerably from program to program. Standardization is needed to assure all graduates are competent and render consistent quality of service.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceAdultEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIndiaInternship and ResidencyMaleOphthalmologistsOphthalmologyRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28643708
PMCPMC5508454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.