Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28643545›Full record

ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2018

Application of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of primitive brain tumours.

A Catanese, F Malacario, L Cirillo, F Toni, C Zenesini, D Casolino, A Bacci, R Agati

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

A Catanese1 Department of Radiology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna Italy.
F Malacario2 Department of Radiology, University of Naples Federico II, Italy.
L Cirillo3 Department of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Italy.
F Toni3 Department of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Italy.
C Zenesini4 Unit of Epidemiology and Biostatistic, Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Italy.
D Casolino5 MTS Medical Technology Solutions, Italy.
A Bacci3 Department of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Italy.
R Agati3 Department of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Italy.
Institute of Neurological Sciences · ITTXT e-solutions (Italy) · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravoxel incoherent motion is a potential non-invasive diagnostic tool in brain tumours, without any clear guidelines for its evaluation yet. In our study, we compare intravoxel incoherent motion with dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging in the quantification of tumour tissue blood perfusion in 28 patients affected by brain tumours, highlighting the issues encountered during the acquisition set-up and post-processing steps. Intravoxel incoherent motion is a new imaging tool and an alternative technique to dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging which is of considerable interest at present. This is partly because it does not require the use of a contrast agent and relies on the intrinsic properties of motion in the capillaries of the spins. Compared to dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging, the intravoxel incoherent motion technique is also characterised by better resolution because the gadolinium-based contrast agent bolus used in the standard technique results in a variation by more than 50% of the signal coming from the brain. Finally, intravoxel incoherent motion is more sensitive to the incoherent motion that originates from small capillary vessels, while the dynamic susceptibility contrast signal is also contaminated by the input from larger arteries and veins, which may result in an overestimation of the blood volume. Although there are limitations due to the heterogeneity of the sample considered in our study, intravoxel incoherent motion has been shown to be an accurate noninvasive radiological biomarker, useful to distinguish between low and high grade glial tumours.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsContrast MediaFemaleGadolinium DTPAHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMeglumineMiddle AgedMotionNeoplasm GradingOrganometallic CompoundsContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAgadoterate meglumineMeglumineOrganometallic CompoundsBrain tumoursdiffusionintravoxel incoherent motionmagnetic resonance imagingneuroradiologytumour perfusion

Identifiers

PMID28643545
PMCPMC5789988
OpenAlexW2687562549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.