Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28643286›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2018

Identifying Primary Care Physicians Continuing Education Needs by Examining Clinical Practices, Attitudes, and Barriers to Screening Across Multiple Cancers.

Brenna Lynn, Alexandra Hatry, Chloe Burnett, Lisa Kan, Tunde Olatunbosun, Bob Bluman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Making Sense of the Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Clinical Practice Guidelines: What Clinicians Need to Know.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effective Educational Approaches to Training Physicians About Lung Cancer Screening.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brenna LynnDivision of Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, VGH JPPN 3300, 910 W 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada. brenna.l@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0658-6458
Alexandra HatryDivision of Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, VGH JPPN 3300, 910 W 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Chloe BurnettDivision of Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, VGH JPPN 3300, 910 W 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Lisa KanScreening Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Tunde OlatunbosunDivision of Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, VGH JPPN 3300, 910 W 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Bob BlumanDivision of Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, VGH JPPN 3300, 910 W 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CABC Cancer Agency · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population-based cancer screening for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancers improves patient outcomes, yet screening rates remain low for some cancers. Despite studies investigating physician perceptions and practices for screening, many have focused on individual cancers and lack primary care physicians' (PCPs) realities around screening for multiple cancers. We surveyed 887 PCPs in British Columbia (BC) to examine practices, beliefs, barriers, and learning needs towards cancer screening across breast, cervical, colorectal, prostate, as well as hereditary predisposition to cancer. Survey results identified differences in PCPs belief in the benefit of screening for recommended and non-recommended routine cancer screening, PCPs adherence to screening guidelines for some cancers and physician comfort and patient testing requests related to physician gender for gender sensitive tests. Further, across cancers, screening barriers included patients with multiple health concerns (41%), limited time to discuss screening (36%), and lack of physician financial compensation to discuss screening (23%). The study highlighted the need for more physician education on screening programs, referral criteria, follow-up processes, and screening guidelines. Conferences (73%), self-directed (46%), small group workshops (42%), hospital rounds (41%), and online CME/CPD (39%) were highly preferred (4+5) for learning about cancer screening. The results suggest a need to improve awareness and adherence to screening guidelines and recommended practices, as well as to provide educational opportunities which address knowledge and practice gaps for physicians.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerEducation, ContinuingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPhysicians, Primary CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesCancerCME effectivenessNeeds assessmentPrimary care physiciansScreening

Identifiers

PMID28643286
OpenAlexW2684494563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.