Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28643233›Full record

ArticleNeurotoxicity research2018

Assessing Environmental Exposure to β-N-Methylamino-L-Alanine (BMAA) in Complex Sample Matrices: a Comparison of the Three Most Popular LC-MS/MS Methods.

Teesha C Baker, Fiona J M Tymm, Susan J Murch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotoxicity research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Environmental Neurotoxin β-Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Teesha C BakerChemistry, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.
Fiona J M TymmChemistry, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.
Susan J MurchChemistry, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada. susan.murch@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5803-9483
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

β-N-Methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) is a naturally occurring non-protein amino acid produced by cyanobacteria, accumulated through natural food webs, found in mammalian brain tissues. Recent evidence indicates an association between BMAA and neurological disease. The accurate detection and quantification of BMAA in food and environmental samples are critical to understanding BMAA metabolism and limiting human exposure. To date, there have been more than 78 reports on BMAA in cyanobacteria and human samples, but different methods give conflicting data and divergent interpretations in the literature. The current work was designed to determine whether orthogonal chromatography and mass spectrometry methods give consistent data interpretation from a single sample matrix using the three most common analytical methods. The methods were recreated as precisely as possible from the literature with optimization of the mass spectrometry parameters specific to the instrument. Four sample matrices, cyanobacteria, human brain, blue crab, and Spirulina, were analyzed as 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate (AQC) derivatives, propyl chloroformate (PCF) derivatives separated by reverse phase chromatography, or underivatized extracts separated by HILIC chromatography. The three methods agreed on positive detection of BMAA in cyanobacteria and no detected BMAA in the sample of human brain matrix. Interpretation was less clear for a sample of blue crab which was strongly positive for BMAA by AQC and PCF but negative by HILIC and for four spirulina raw materials that were negative by PCF but positive by AQC and HILIC. Together, these data demonstrate that the methods gave different results and that the choices in interpretation of the methods determined whether BMAA was detected. Failure to detect BMAA cannot be considered proof of absence.

Indexed as

Chromatography, LiquidTandem Mass SpectrometryAmino Acids, DiaminoAnimalsBrachyuraBrainCyanobacteria ToxinsEnvironmental ExposureHumansSpirulinaAmino Acids, Diaminobeta-N-methylamino-L-alanineCyanobacteria ToxinsBMAAMethod validationSpirulinaβ-N-methylamino-L-alanine

Identifiers

PMID28643233
OpenAlexW2689512303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.