Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28643222›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of implant dentistry2017

Ridge preservation using an in situ hardening biphasic calcium phosphate (β-TCP/HA) bone graft substitute-a clinical, radiological, and histological study.

Ashish Kakar, Bappanadu H Sripathi Rao, Shashikanth Hegde, Nikhil Deshpande, Annette Lindner, Heiner Nagursky, Aditya Patney, Harsh Mahajan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of implant dentistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. New Insights in Hydrogels for Periodontal Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation of an In Situ HardeningDentistry journal · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashish KakarYenepoya University Dental College, University Road, Mangalore, 575018, India. kakar_ashish@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6807-0003
Bappanadu H Sripathi RaoYenepoya University Dental College, University Road, Mangalore, 575018, India.
Shashikanth HegdeYenepoya University Dental College, University Road, Mangalore, 575018, India.
Nikhil DeshpandeDental Foundations and Research Centre, Malad, Mumbai, 400064, India.
Annette LindnerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Center for Dental Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Heiner NagurskyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Center for Dental Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Aditya PatneyMahajan Imaging Center, K-18 Hauz Khas Enclave, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Harsh MahajanMahajan Imaging Center, K-18 Hauz Khas Enclave, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Yenepoya University · INUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-Extraction ridge preservation using bone graft substitutes is a conservative technique to maintain the width of the alveolar ridge. The objective of the present study was to evaluate an in situ hardening biphasic (HA/β-TCP) bone graft substitutes for ridge preservation without primary wound closure or a dental membrane.

methodsA total of 15 patients reported for tooth extraction were enrolled in this study. Implants were placed in average 5.2 ± 2 months after socket grafting. At this visit, Cone Beam CT (CBCT) images and core biopsies were taken. Implant stability (ISQ) was assessed at the insertion as well as at the day of final restoration.

resultsCBCT data revealed 0.79 ± 0.73 mm ridge width reduction from grafting to implant placement. Histomorphometric analysis of core biopsy samples revealed in average 21.34 ± 9.14% of new bone in the grafted sites. Primary implant stability was high (ISQ levels 70.3 ± 9.6) and further increased until final restoration.

conclusionsThe results of this study show that grafting of intact post-extraction sockets using a biphasic in situ hardening bone graft substitute results in an effective preservation of the ridge contour and sufficient new bone formation in the grafted sites, which is imperative for successful implant placement.

Identifiers

PMID28643222
PMCPMC5481287
OpenAlexW2723383680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.