ArticleLearning & behavior2018
Temporal discounting of aversive consequences in rats.
Article in Learning & behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methylphenidate reduces rats' temporal discounting of aversive outcomes.Psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Delay of punishment highlights differential vulnerability to developing addiction-like behavior toward sweet food.Translational psychiatry · 2024Article
- Advances in understanding meso-cortico-limbic-striatal systems mediating risky reward seeking.Journal of neurochemistry · 2021Review
- Reward/Punishment-Based Decision Making in Rodents.Current protocols in neuroscience · 2020Article
- What Is Addiction? How Can Animal and Human Research Be Used to Advance Research, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Alcohol and Other Substance Use Disorders?Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous research has extensively evaluated the impact of delay on the value of positive reinforcers, but the study of its impact on the value of aversive consequences is scarce. The present study employed a modification of Evenden and Ryan's procedure (1996, Psychopharmacology, 128(2), 161-170) to obtain data on temporal discounting of an aversive consequence, with rats as experimental subjects. In the first phase of the procedure, rats chose between one-pellet and four-pellet alternatives; when subjects developed preference for the larger-amount alternative, a shock was added to it, resulting in a loss of preference. In the first experimental condition, the delay to shock was progressively increased within each session from zero to 40 s (ascending delays), which resulted in a recovery of the preference for the larger-amount + shock alternative as the delay to shock was increased. In a subsequent condition (descending delays) the delay to shock was progressively decreased within each session, from 40 to 0 s. In both conditions, the preference for the smaller-amount no-shock alternative was well described by a hyperbolic function. The order of presentation of the delays within the session, ascending or descending, did not alter the relationship between preference and delay to shock. The temporal discounting curve obtained in the present study could represent a baseline for analyzing the impact that diverse environmental and pharmacological variables have on the temporal discounting of aversive consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28643142What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.