ArticleUrolithiasis2018
Procedural sedation and analgesia for pediatric shock wave lithotripsy: a 10 year experience of single institution.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contemporary metabolic evaluation, medical and minimally invasive management of stones in children.Urolithiasis · 2025Review
- Pediatric Nephrolithiasis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Minimally invasive surgery for pediatric renal and ureteric stones: A therapeutic update.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Neonatal Anesthesia by Ketamine in Neonatal Rats Inhibits the Proliferation and Differentiation of Hippocampal Neural Stem Cells and Decreases Neurocognitive Function in Adulthood via Inhibition of the Notch1 Signaling Pathway.Molecular neurobiology · 2021Article
- Neuroprotective Effects of Dexmedetomidine on the Ketamine-Induced Disruption of the Proliferation and Differentiation of Developing Neural Stem Cells in the Subventricular Zone.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate anesthesia practice for pediatric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) according to the age groups and discuss the anesthetic management of these patients. Pediatric patients treated with ESWL because of urolithiasis under anesthesia in our department between December 2007 and January 2017 were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 251 patients were divided into two groups as Group PS: preschool children (<6 years) and Group S: school children (≥6 years). Groups were compared according to ketamine and midazolam doses, extra anesthetic agent requirement, duration of procedure, procedural and postprocedural complications due to anesthesia, as well as mean number of sessions and calculus diameter. A total of 408 sessions of ESWL were applied to 251 children included in the study. Overall, mean age of the patients was 4.5 ± 3.2 years (7 months-14 years). In school children (Group S), mean ketamine and midazolam doses were significantly higher than the preschool group (p < 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in additional anesthetic agent requirement (p = 0.35) as well as mean number of SWL sessions (p = 0.23), duration of anesthesia (p = 0.93), stone size (p = 0.20), and stone laterality (p = 0.71) in both preschool and school children. No severe complications were observed in both groups. In pediatric ESWL patients, ketamine-midazolam combination is an effective and safety choice for outpatient anesthesia. Appropriate dose adjustment in a monitorized and well-equipped setting is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.