Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28642755›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017

Vaginal and Uterine Bacterial Communities in Postpartum Lactating Cows.

Brooke A Clemmons, Sydney T Reese, Felipe G Dantas, Gessica A Franco, Timothy P L Smith, Olusoji I Adeyosoye, Ky G Pohler, Phillip R Myer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reproductive Tract Microbiota of Mares.Veterinary sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brooke A ClemmonsUniversity of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleTN, United States.
Sydney T ReeseUniversity of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleTN, United States.
Felipe G DantasUniversity of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleTN, United States.
Gessica A FrancoUniversity of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleTN, United States.
Timothy P L SmithU.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, NEUnited States.
Olusoji I AdeyosoyeDepartment of Animal Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo UniversityIle-Ife, Nigeria.
Ky G PohlerUniversity of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleTN, United States.
Phillip R MyerUniversity of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleTN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive inefficiency in cattle has major impacts on overall productivity of cattle operations, increasing cost of production, and impacting the sustainability of the cattle enterprise. Decreased reproductive success and associated disease states have been correlated with the presence of specific microbes and microbial community profiles, yet details of the relationship between microbial communities and host physiology are not well known. The present study profiles and compares the microbial communities in the bovine uterus and vagina using 16S rRNA sequencing of the V1-V3 hypervariable region at the time of artificial insemination. Significant differences (

Indexed as

bacteriomecowreproductive successuterinevaginal

Identifiers

PMID28642755
PMCPMC5463355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.