ArticleBioinformation2017
Virtual screening following rational drug design based approach for introducing new anti amyloid beta aggregation agent.
Article in Bioinformation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stable Cavitation Interferes with AβJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2022Article
- Computer-Aided Multi-Target Management of Emergent Alzheimer's Disease.Bioinformation · 2018Article
- Molecular docking based screening of Listeriolysin-O for improved inhibitors.Bioinformation · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amyloid β (Aβ) sheets aggregations is the main reason of Alzheimer disease. The interacting areas between monomers are residue number 38 to 42. Inhibition of interaction between Aβ molecules prevents plaque formation. In the present study, we have performed a high-throughput virtual screening among ZINC database and top 1000 hits were checked again regarding binding affinity by AutoDock software. Top 4 successive second step screening hits was considered for drug design purpose against aggregation site of Aβ molecules. The toxicity and pharmacological properties of new designed ligands was assessed by PROTOX and FAFdrugs3 webservers. Several steps of modifications performed in the structures of hit#1 and hit#2 and finally new designed ligand based on hit 1, 1-RD-3 (3-[(Z)-6-Hydroxy-4-{[5-(2-methoxyethyl)-6-methyltetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl]methyl}-1-methyl-3-hexenyloxy]tetrahydro-2Hpyran- 4-ol) and a designed ligand based on hit 2, 2-RD-2 (6-(Hydroxymethyl)-4-{5-hydroxy-6-methyl-4-[(3- methylcyclohexyl)methyl]tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yloxy}tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2,3,5-triol) could successfully pass pharmacological filters. The LD50 of 37000 mg/kg for 1-RD-3 and 2000 mg/kg for 2-RD-2 indicates that the designed ligands can be considered as new candidates for anti Aβ aggregation to treat Alzheimer's disease. Interestingly, after performing several modification steps still a considerable binding affinity of -9.3 kcal/mol for 1-RD-3 and -9.8 kcal/mol for 2-RD-2 still remained. Theoretically, the new designed molecules can reduce the deposition of Aβ in the cerebral cortex and as the results the Alzheimer symptoms could be decreased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.