Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28642541›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2017

Can UK undergraduate dental programmes provide training in non-surgical facial aesthetics?

T W M Walker, F Gately, S Stagnell, A Kerai, C Mills, S Thomas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Review on the Expanding Role of Dentists in Facial Esthetics.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

T W M WalkerDepartment of Oral &Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Oral &Dental Sciences, Bristol Dental Hospital, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
F GatelyDepartment of Oral &Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Oral &Dental Sciences, Bristol Dental Hospital, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
S StagnellDepartment of Oral &Maxillofacial Surgery, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK.
A KeraiDepartment of Oral &Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Oral &Dental Sciences, Bristol Dental Hospital, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
C MillsDepartment of Dental &Maxillofacial Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
S ThomasDepartment of Oral &Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Oral &Dental Sciences, Bristol Dental Hospital, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University Of Bristol Dental Hospital · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBSalisbury NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim Recently, more and more dentists have found themselves engaging in the delivery of non-surgical facial aesthetics (NSFA) as part of their regular practice routine. NSFA is a growing field in aesthetic medicine that is practised by a range of clinicians including doctors, dentists and registered prescriber nurses and is an industry estimated to be worth over £3 billion in the UK alone. In the past few years, several public scandals in aesthetic medicine have prompted reactions by several bodies including the Government and Royal Colleges. With Health Education England (HEE) having recently released standards in education, it is clear that a shift in attitude towards training is imminent. With a large volume of dentists making up this NSFA workforce it is reasonable to consider the stance of undergraduate training and the relevance of the existing knowledge within dentistry in the context of the HEE standards.Method All dental schools in the UK were contacted to establish the range of subjects taught within the curriculum, with particular reference to those relevant to NSFA. The two largest aesthetic pharmacies were contacted regarding numbers of registered dentists they serve.Results Twelve out of 16 dental schools responded. Two-thirds of responding dental schools do not cover NSFA in their curricula. However, many dental schools cover related subjects including: facial anatomy/material science/neuromuscular junction physiology (100%), anatomy of the aging face (66%), pharmacology of botulinum toxin (25%) and ethical-legal implications of aesthetic dentistry/NSFA (50%/42% respectively).Conclusion Dentists are well placed to deliver NSFA given their background in relevant subjects and surgical training. With the emergence and growth of such a large multi-disciplinary field it is crucial that dentistry is not left behind. Just as most dental schools have embraced the evolution of cosmetic dentistry and implantology, it would be prudent to consider that training standards around NSFA are reflected in both undergraduate curricula and appropriate post-graduate clinical training for dentistry.

Indexed as

FaceCurriculumEducation, DentalEstheticsEsthetics, DentalHumansUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID28642541
OpenAlexW2709021988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.