Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28642368›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2017

The influence of disulfide bonds on the mechanical stability of proteins is context dependent.

Aitor Manteca, Álvaro Alonso-Caballero, Marie Fertin, Simon Poly, David De Sancho, Raul Perez-Jimenez

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Regulation of titin-based cardiac stiffness by unfolded domain oxidation (UnDOx).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aitor MantecaFrom the Nanobiomechanics Laboratory, CIC nanoGUNE, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Álvaro Alonso-CaballeroFrom the Nanobiomechanics Laboratory, CIC nanoGUNE, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Marie FertinFrom the Nanobiomechanics Laboratory, CIC nanoGUNE, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Simon Polythe Interfaculty Institute of Biochemistry, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany, and.
David De SanchoFrom the Nanobiomechanics Laboratory, CIC nanoGUNE, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain, d.desancho@nanogune.eu.ORCID 0000-0002-8985-2685
Raul Perez-JimenezFrom the Nanobiomechanics Laboratory, CIC nanoGUNE, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain, r.perezjimenez@nanogune.eu.
CIC nanoGUNE · ESIkerbasque · ESUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disulfide bonds play a crucial role in proteins, modulating their stability and constraining their conformational dynamics. A particularly important case is that of proteins that need to withstand forces arising from their normal biological function and that are often disulfide bonded. However, the influence of disulfides on the overall mechanical stability of proteins is poorly understood. Here, we used single-molecule force spectroscopy (smFS) to study the role of disulfide bonds in different mechanical proteins in terms of their unfolding forces. For this purpose, we chose the pilus protein FimG from Gram-negative bacteria and a disulfide-bonded variant of the I91 human cardiac titin polyprotein. Our results show that disulfide bonds can alter the mechanical stability of proteins in different ways depending on the properties of the system. Specifically, disulfide-bonded FimG undergoes a 30% increase in its mechanical stability compared with its reduced counterpart, whereas the unfolding force of I91 domains experiences a decrease of 15% relative to the WT form. Using a coarse-grained simulation model, we rationalized that the increase in mechanical stability of FimG is due to a shift in the mechanical unfolding pathway. The simple topology-based explanation suggests a neutral effect in the case of titin. In summary, our results indicate that disulfide bonds in proteins act in a context-dependent manner rather than simply as mechanical lockers, underscoring the importance of considering disulfide bonds both computationally and experimentally when studying the mechanical properties of proteins.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularAmino Acid SubstitutionConnectinCysteineCystineEscherichia coli ProteinsFimbriae ProteinsHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationOxidation-ReductionPeptide FragmentsProtein ConformationProtein EngineeringProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein StabilityConnectinCysteineCystineEscherichia coli ProteinsFimbriae ProteinsFimG protein, E coliPeptide FragmentsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTTN protein, humanatomic force microscopy (AFM)disulfidemolecular dynamicsprotein foldingsingle-molecule biophysics

Identifiers

PMID28642368
PMCPMC5555196
OpenAlexW2654956150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.