Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28642263›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Volumetric Analysis from a Harmonized Multisite Brain MRI Study of a Single Subject with Multiple Sclerosis.

R T Shinohara, J Oh, G Nair, P A Calabresi, C Davatzikos, J Doshi, R G Henry, G Kim, K A Linn, N Papinutto and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. FLAIRNeuroImage. Clinical · 2019
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Radiomics in spinal research: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Calibration of MRI-based reference intervals to new samples.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

R T ShinoharaFrom the Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (R.T.S., K.A.L.) rshi@mail.med.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8627-8203
J OhDepartment of Neurology (J.O., P.A.C., D.S.R.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5519-6088
G NairTranslational Neuroradiology Section (G.N., D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3725-615X
P A CalabresiDepartment of Neurology (J.O., P.A.C., D.S.R.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7776-6472
C DavatzikosRadiology (C.D., J.D.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1025-8561
J DoshiRadiology (C.D., J.D.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2875-5814
R G HenryDepartment of Neurology (R.G.H., N.P., W.S., A.Z.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8232-7562
G KimLaboratory for Neuroimaging Research (G.K., S.T., F.Y., R.B.), Partners Multiple Sclerosis Center.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4154-9959
K A LinnFrom the Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (R.T.S., K.A.L.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8463-8084
N PapinuttoDepartment of Neurology (R.G.H., N.P., W.S., A.Z.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2184-4782
D PelletierDepartment of Neurology (D.P.), Yale Medical School, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0741-5615
D L PhamHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (D.L.P., S.R.), Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0053-2034
D S ReichDepartment of Neurology (J.O., P.A.C., D.S.R.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2628-4334
W RooneyAdvanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University (W.R.), Portland, Oregon.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0617-1540
S RoyHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (D.L.P., S.R.), Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7997-3993
W SternDepartment of Neurology (R.G.H., N.P., W.S., A.Z.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1236-7654
S TummalaLaboratory for Neuroimaging Research (G.K., S.T., F.Y., R.B.), Partners Multiple Sclerosis Center.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0659-1871
F YousufLaboratory for Neuroimaging Research (G.K., S.T., F.Y., R.B.), Partners Multiple Sclerosis Center.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3036-9605
A ZhuDepartment of Neurology (R.G.H., N.P., W.S., A.Z.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0083-5107
N L SicotteDepartment of Neurology (N.L.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5131-3352
R BakshiLaboratory for Neuroimaging Research (G.K., S.T., F.Y., R.B.), Partners Multiple Sclerosis Center.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8601-5534
NAIMS Cooperative

Funding

Multimodal MRI in Multiple SclerosisZIANS003119 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI REICH, DANIEL · 2010 to 2025
$53.4M
COMPUTATIONAL NEUROANATOMY OF AGING USING SHAPE ANALYSISR01AG014971 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 1999 to 2015
$3.5M
Adaptive Large-Scale Framework for Automatic Biomedical Image SegmentationR01EB017255 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI YUSHKEVICH, PAUL A. · 2014 to 2018
$3.0M
Statistical methods for large and complex databases of ultra-high-dimensionalR01NS085211 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHINOHARA, RUSSELL TAKESHI · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
Spatiotemporal Modeling of MRI Brain Lesion Trajectories of Biomarker DiscoveryR21NS093349 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ELOYAN, ANI, SHINOHARA, RUSSELL TAKESHI · 2016 to 2017
$454k
A High-Performance Computing System for Advanced ImagingS10OD018224 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ROONEY, WILLIAM D · 2014 to 2014
$222k
32-Channel Head Coil and Hardware Upgrade for 3T Magnetom Trio A Tim InstrumentS10OD016356 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ROONEY, WILLIAM D · 2014 to 2014
$115k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG014971NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017255NIH HHS S10 OD016356NIH HHS S10 OD018224NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085211NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS093349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMR imaging can be used to measure structural changes in the brains of individuals with multiple sclerosis and is essential for diagnosis, longitudinal monitoring, and therapy evaluation. The North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative steering committee developed a uniform high-resolution 3T MR imaging protocol relevant to the quantification of cerebral lesions and atrophy and implemented it at 7 sites across the United States. To assess intersite variability in scan data, we imaged a volunteer with relapsing-remitting MS with a scan-rescan at each site. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll imaging was acquired on Siemens scanners (4 Skyra, 2 Tim Trio, and 1 Verio). Expert segmentations were manually obtained for T1-hypointense and T2 (FLAIR) hyperintense lesions. Several automated lesion-detection and whole-brain, cortical, and deep gray matter volumetric pipelines were applied. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess variability across sites, as well as systematic biases in the volumetric measurements that were site-related.

resultsSystematic biases due to site differences in expert-traced lesion measurements were significant (

conclusionsEven in multicenter studies with consistent scanner field strength and manufacturer after protocol harmonization, systematic differences can lead to severe biases in volumetric analyses.

Indexed as

AdultBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingNeuroimagingReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID28642263
PMCPMC5557658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.