Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28642229›Full record

ArticleEMBO reports2017

Evolutionary dynamics of the kinetochore network in eukaryotes as revealed by comparative genomics.

Jolien Je van Hooff, Eelco Tromer, Leny M van Wijk, Berend Snel, Geert Jpl Kops

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in EMBO reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 149 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
149citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

149 citing papers in PubMed, 268 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Structure and function of the centromere and inner kinetochore.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Structure and function of the outer kinetochore.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Correlated Gene Copy Number Changes in a Seminal Fluid Protein Network inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Centromeres drive and take a break.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jolien Je van HooffHubrecht Institute - KNAW (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences), Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8754-1894
Eelco TromerHubrecht Institute - KNAW (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences), Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3540-7727
Leny M van WijkTheoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4953-9368
Berend SnelTheoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands b.snel@uu.nl g.kops@hubrecht.eu.ORCID 0000-0002-5804-8547
Geert Jpl KopsHubrecht Institute - KNAW (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences), Utrecht, The Netherlands b.snel@uu.nl g.kops@hubrecht.eu.ORCID 0000-0003-3555-5295
Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During eukaryotic cell division, the sister chromatids of duplicated chromosomes are pulled apart by microtubules, which connect via kinetochores. The kinetochore is a multiprotein structure that links centromeres to microtubules, and that emits molecular signals in order to safeguard the equal distribution of duplicated chromosomes over daughter cells. Although microtubule-mediated chromosome segregation is evolutionary conserved, kinetochore compositions seem to have diverged. To systematically inventory kinetochore diversity and to reconstruct its evolution, we determined orthologs of 70 kinetochore proteins in 90 phylogenetically diverse eukaryotes. The resulting ortholog sets imply that the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) possessed a complex kinetochore and highlight that current-day kinetochores differ substantially. These kinetochores diverged through gene loss, duplication, and, less frequently, invention and displacement. Various kinetochore components co-evolved with one another, albeit in different manners. These co-evolutionary patterns improve our understanding of kinetochore function and evolution, which we illustrated with the RZZ complex, TRIP13, the MCC, and some nuclear pore proteins. The extensive diversity of kinetochore compositions in eukaryotes poses numerous questions regarding evolutionary flexibility of essential cellular functions.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularCell Cycle ProteinsCell DivisionChromosome SegregationEukaryotaGene DuplicationGenomicsKinetochoresMicrotubulesCell Cycle Proteinsco‐evolutioneukaryotic diversityevolutionary cell biologygene losskinetochore

Identifiers

PMID28642229
PMCPMC5579357
OpenAlexW2683561870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.