Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28642213›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2017

Development of a Web-Based Intervention for Addressing Distress in Caregivers of Patients Receiving Stem Cell Transplants: Formative Evaluation With Qualitative Interviews and Focus Groups

Nicole Amoyal Pensak, Tanisha Joshi, Teresa Simoneau, Kristin Kilbourn, Alaina Carr, Jean Kutner, Mark L Laudenslager

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole Amoyal Pensak *Hackensack University Medical Center, Department of Research, Cancer Prevention and Control, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2945-5255
Tanisha JoshiUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9631-532X
Teresa SimoneauVA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Golden, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3631-2757
Kristin KilbournUniversity of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7218-1988
Alaina CarrUniversity of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9226-8439
Jean KutnerUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8079-831X
Mark L LaudenslagerUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Psychiatry, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9815-3026
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USHackensack University Medical Center · USVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System · US

Funding

Multidisciplinary Research Training in Palliative CareT32AG044296 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI STACY M FISCHER, JEAN S KUTNER · 2014 to 2026
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA126071NIA NIH HHS T32 AG044296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaregivers of cancer patients experience significant burden and distress including depression and anxiety. We previously demonstrated the efficacy of an eight session, in-person, one-on-one stress management intervention to reduce distress in caregivers of patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (allo-HSCT).

objectiveThe objective of this study was to adapt and enhance the in-person caregiver stress management intervention to a mobilized website (eg, tablet, smartphone, or computer-based) for self-delivery in order to enhance dissemination to caregiver populations most in need.

methodsWe used an established approach for development of a mhealth intervention, completing the first two research and evaluation steps: Step One: Formative Research (eg, expert and stakeholder review from patients, caregivers, and palliative care experts) and Step Two: Pretesting (eg, Focus Groups and Individual Interviews with caregivers of patients with autologous HSCT (auto-HSCT). Step one included feedback elicited for a mock-up version of Pep-Pal session one from caregiver, patients and clinician stakeholders from a multidisciplinary palliative care team (N=9 caregivers and patient stakeholders and N=20 palliative care experts). Step two included two focus groups (N=6 caregivers) and individual interviews (N=9 caregivers) regarding Pep-Pal's look and feel, content, acceptability, and potential usability/feasibility. Focus groups and individual interviews were audio-recorded. In addition, individual interviews were transcribed, and applied thematic analysis was conducted in order to gain an in-depth understanding to inform the development and refinement of the mobilized caregiver stress management intervention, Pep-Pal (PsychoEducation and skills for Patient caregivers).

resultsOverall, results were favorable. Pep-Pal was deemed acceptable for caregivers of patients receiving an auto-HSCT. The refined Pep-Pal program consisted of 9 sessions (Introduction to Stress, Stress and the Mind Body Connection, How Thoughts Can Lead to Stress, Coping with Stress, Strategies for Maintaining Energy and Stamina, Coping with Uncertainty, Managing Changing Relationships and Communicating Needs, Getting the Support You Need, and Improving Intimacy) delivered via video instruction through a mobilized website.

conclusionsFeedback from stakeholder groups, focus groups, and individual interviews provided valuable feedback in key areas that was integrated into the development of Pep-Pal with the goal of enhancing dissemination, engagement, acceptability, and usability.

Indexed as

anxietycancercaregiversdepressiondistressstem cell transplant

Identifiers

PMID28642213
PMCPMC5500777
OpenAlexW2651013032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.