Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28641941›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2017

Role of recombination and replication fork restart in repeat instability.

Erica J Polleys, Nealia C M House, Catherine H Freudenreich

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multifaceted roles of SUMO in DNA metabolism.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Low microsatellite instability: A distinct instability type in gastric cancer?Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Homologous recombination within repetitive DNA.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Structure-forming repeats and their impact on genome stability.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
  20. The Brilliance ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erica J PolleysDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford MA 02155, USA.
Nealia C M HouseDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford MA 02155, USA.
Catherine H FreudenreichDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford MA 02155, USA; Program in Genetics, Tufts University, Boston MA 02111, USA. Electronic address: catherine.freudenreich@tufts.edu.
Tufts University · US

Funding

Mutations Arising During DNA RepairP01GM105473 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HABER, JAMES E · 2014 to 2018
$8.6M
Fork Restart at Replication Barriers and Effects on Genome StabilityR01GM122880 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI FREUDENREICH, CATHERINE H · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM105473NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic genomes contain many repetitive DNA sequences that exhibit size instability. Some repeat elements have the added complication of being able to form secondary structures, such as hairpin loops, slipped DNA, triplex DNA or G-quadruplexes. Especially when repeat sequences are long, these DNA structures can form a significant impediment to DNA replication and repair, leading to DNA nicks, gaps, and breaks. In turn, repair or replication fork restart attempts within the repeat DNA can lead to addition or removal of repeat elements, which can sometimes lead to disease. One important DNA repair mechanism to maintain genomic integrity is recombination. Though early studies dismissed recombination as a mechanism driving repeat expansion and instability, recent results indicate that mitotic recombination is a key pathway operating within repetitive DNA. The action is two-fold: first, it is an important mechanism to repair nicks, gaps, breaks, or stalled forks to prevent chromosome fragility and protect cell health; second, recombination can cause repeat expansions or contractions, which can be deleterious. In this review, we summarize recent developments that illuminate the role of recombination in maintaining genome stability at DNA repeats.

Indexed as

DNA Repeat ExpansionDNA ReplicationRecombination, GeneticAnimalsDNADNA RepairGenomic InstabilityHumansNucleic Acid ConformationYeastsDNAChromosome fragilityDNA structureRecombinationReplication fork restartTrinucleotide repeat expansion

Identifiers

PMID28641941
PMCPMC5541998
OpenAlexW2621571490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.