Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28641696›Full record

ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2017

[Validation of the Mandarin Chinese Version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Lung Resection for Patients with Lung Disease].

Zhihua Xu, Rongjia Lin, Guowei Che, Mingming Wang, Yanli Ji, Pengfei Li, Mei Yang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. [What is Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Humanity or Technology?]Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2018
    Article
  11. [Establishment and Optimization of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery System 
for Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2017
    Review
  12. [Enhanced Lung Recovery after Surgery, Is It A Necessary for Precision Therapy?]Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhihua XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Rongjia LinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Guowei CheDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Mingming WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Yanli JiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Pengfei LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Mei YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
West China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Mandarin Chinese version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ-MC) is a symptom specific questionnaire designed to assess the impact of cough severity, a major symptom of postoperative patients undergoing lung resection is cough. The aim of this study is to validate the LCQ-MC in patients with lung operation.

methodsTotally 121 patients undergone the lung operation of single medical team, from September 2015 to April 2016 in the Thoracic Surgery Department of West China hospital Sichuan University, were investigated by LCQ-MC before and after operation. We analyzed and calculated the preoperative and postoperative scores of LCQ-MC and Cronbach α.

results①The mean LCQ-MC score in preoperative (19.57±1.73) was significant higher than postoperative (17.71±2.72) (P=0.041). ②The Cronbach α in preoperative (0.87) and postoperative (0.89) was significant higher than 0.7. ③The preoperative scores of LCQ-MC (19.31±1.84) was significantly lower in postoperative cough group than in without postoperative cough group (19.97±1.46) (P=0.038). The postoperative scores of LCQ-MC (16.67±2.91) was significantly lower in postoperative cough group than in without postoperative cough group (19.30±1.32) (P=0.001). ④There was no statistical difference (P=0.936) between postoperative LCQ-MC score (17.75±2.51) in lobectomy group and non-lobectomy group (17.79±3.04).

conclusionsThe LCQ-MC can assess the condition of cough after thoracoscopic surgery in patients with pulmonary disease.
.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAsian PeopleChinaCoughFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodPulmonary Surgical ProceduresQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28641696
PMCPMC5973360
OpenAlexW2988968284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.